Hi KennyDap, please accept my apologies for making you feel like that. I don’t have such intentions. I also should have provided a clearer changeset comment.
My intention was to fix a multipolygon error which was received through OSM validation checks. osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Valid_multipolygon_conditions is stating that inner polygons must not overlap with outer polygons and not touch on common segments.
Thank you for your understanding on this matter.

Thank you for the message. I’m glad to help, happy mapping!

Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, thank you for making the corrections. Based on previous community discussions, we refrain from adjusting similar situations to this, so this was an oversight. I will be more mindful in my future edits. Thank you for your understanding, you have a nice day too.

Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi rskedgell, thanks for reaching out and highlighting this edit. I misinterpreted this situation from aerial imagery. Thanks for the correction and I'll take care to avoid this in the future.

Hi rskedgell, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi JeroenHoek. Navigation tools unfortunately would treat this as two separate junctions present and would unnecessarily prompt users going across to take turns instead of continuing straight ahead. Modified geometry would provide a better routing experience for the ones using navigation tools. Thank you for your inquiry. I hope I was able to describe my reasoning clearly.

Thank you for making the corrections. I downloaded too much data in same layers, hence issue occurred during changes loading.

Hi JeroehHoek, Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and get back to you.

Hi 南安南洋南昌,
Thank you for reaching out to me. I am not clear on the issue you are commenting on so it would be very helpful if you could provide further information to provide that clarity. The edit I made was to convert this polygon from a multipolygon to a simple polygon and removed the relation. I also added the natural=water tag because as per wiki guideline the single member shouldn't be in multipoloygon relation.

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Hi noahdoersing,
Thank you for reaching out.
To fix relation for given water object, I made changes to polygon and removed reed - cover part incorrectly. We trust your expertise that we should not remove wetland, which you created based on your local knowledge. I have made the corrections and resolved the validation error. Thank you for your patience and feedback.

Hello mike rosisky
I have fixed validation error between building overlapping building.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello ROLEX o,
I have fixed validation error between building & building intersecting for way/559047983
way/559047466
way/559045112
way/559045366
way/559045367
way/559046523
way/559046524
way/559057008
way/602225714
way/602225713
way/602225712
way/816570265
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I have added connectivity in way/1268968028.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello omino
Thank you for mapping!
Way id 1268613495 was not connected so I added the missing connection.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I created a way/1269094443 (it was deleted previously) and aligned it according to Mapbox Satellite Imagery.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello omino
Thank you for mapping!
I created a way/1269093550 (it was deleted previously) and aligned it according to Bing Aerial Imagery.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I have added connectivity in way/445959462.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hi pitfire, thank you for your valuable feedback. You have helped provide me with some clarity on these situations which I will follow in future similar scenarios.

Hi pitfire, thank you for your valuable feedback. You have helped provide me with some clarity on these situations which I will follow in future similar scenarios.