OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92784164 about 5 years ago

Probably best to leave them for now. It will make reverting simpler if someone decides to do that.

92784164 about 5 years ago

Hey eteb3,

I looked into this and it seems like the changeset below removed or otherwise broke a bunch of pre existing land cover relations leaving behind those untagged ways. We repaired this one relation, but that entire changeset could need repairing or reverting.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/92582733/

56367288 almost 7 years ago

Hi Bernhard,

Good catch on the streams. I went to go fix them but looks like you just did. Thanks!

-Jeff

55689626 almost 7 years ago

Hi Peter,

I definitely agree with you. Thanks for making the change. I improved the geometry a bit as well.

-Jeff

52049391 almost 7 years ago

Hi Peter,

This looks like a false connection to me. I have removed it. Thanks for letting us know.

-Jeff

52392246 almost 7 years ago

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the very detailed feedback. This sort of local knowledge is always valuable. The way only being clear in some of the imagery is suspicious and worth waiting on ground truthing. These all seem like reasonable changes to ensure the best experience of OSM users.

-Jeff

52053617 about 7 years ago

Hi Beddhist,

I appreciate the feedback. Based on your ground truthing I downgraded the road to residential. I smoothed out the road geometry that you pointed along that unclassified road as well.

Thanks,
Jeff

56941985 about 7 years ago

Thanks for the heads up Tom.

I fixed that intersection.

-Jeff

58961202 about 7 years ago

Hi Russ,

To my eyes, it appears to me that that the road is paved up to around the middle village. Perhaps splitting it there and removing the unpaved tag before that would be more accurate. Let me know what you think.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

61553853 about 7 years ago

Hi Stephan,

way/615994900 and 615994806 are connected. Do you mean merged?

For the second comment, we train our editors to be cautious about making unclear connections to avoid adding incorrect data which may have been the cause here. However, way/615994782 is a clear enough connection so I've added it now.

Thanks for the feedback!
-Jeff

59278258 about 7 years ago

Hi Tom,

You're absolutely right. I've updated the road.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

55725630 about 7 years ago

Hi Tom,

I saw a couple extra nodes on way/559334435. Can you confirm that is what you are referring to?

Thanks,
Jeff

55780120 about 7 years ago

Hi Tom,

We will adjust the secondary road of course, but it was not aligned by us, we just connected to it.

-Jeff