Probably best to leave them for now. It will make reverting simpler if someone decides to do that.

Hey eteb3,

I looked into this and it seems like the changeset below removed or otherwise broke a bunch of pre existing land cover relations leaving behind those untagged ways. We repaired this one relation, but that entire changeset could need repairing or reverting.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/92582733/

Hi Bernhard,

Good catch on the streams. I went to go fix them but looks like you just did. Thanks!

-Jeff

Hi Peter,

I definitely agree with you. Thanks for making the change. I improved the geometry a bit as well.

-Jeff

Hi Peter,

This looks like a false connection to me. I have removed it. Thanks for letting us know.

-Jeff

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the very detailed feedback. This sort of local knowledge is always valuable. The way only being clear in some of the imagery is suspicious and worth waiting on ground truthing. These all seem like reasonable changes to ensure the best experience of OSM users.

-Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I appreciate the feedback. Based on your ground truthing I downgraded the road to residential. I smoothed out the road geometry that you pointed along that unclassified road as well.

Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks for the heads up Tom.

I fixed that intersection.

-Jeff

Hi Russ,

To my eyes, it appears to me that that the road is paved up to around the middle village. Perhaps splitting it there and removing the unpaved tag before that would be more accurate. Let me know what you think.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

way/615994900 and 615994806 are connected. Do you mean merged?

For the second comment, we train our editors to be cautious about making unclear connections to avoid adding incorrect data which may have been the cause here. However, way/615994782 is a clear enough connection so I've added it now.

Thanks for the feedback!
-Jeff

Hi Tom,

You're absolutely right. I've updated the road.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

I saw a couple extra nodes on way/559334435. Can you confirm that is what you are referring to?

Thanks,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

We will adjust the secondary road of course, but it was not aligned by us, we just connected to it.

-Jeff

Hi Stephan,

This is a task edge inconsistency we will definitely cleanup.

-Jeff

Hi Stephan,

For these issues, we just hadn't published the task to the north of this one yet. I just added the data myself and these should be resolved. Due to the gridded nature of our data these issues will happen from time to time in the short term but we will eventually fill in the neighboring squares.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

These were all along a task boundary where one side kept data and the other deleted it. The editor should have cleaned these up as part of publishing the data to OSM and I have talked to them and reiterated this point to the team.

However, I want to assure you that we would have caught this during our final validation step where we look at a project as a whole and blend the data to fix issues like this where one editor may have deleted data while another kept it or to resolve tagging inconsistencies. In the end we want our task grids to be completely invisible along with any lingering validation issues of course.

This project was only recently finished and there is a bit of lag time between that and the final check as that work takes some time and not every editor is trained to do it.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

I assume this refers to way/434684710?

Not sure what happened here but I've fixed the bad nodes on the road. Sorry about that.

-Jeff

Hi Tom,

I assume you are referring to way/290748046?

I added the layer tag and deleted the extra node but this wasn't our data. It was created and tagged by Russ.

-Jeff

Hi Tom,

I updated the road alignment. Thanks for the feedback.

-Jeff

Hi Tom,

I reduced the amount of nodes, but for the tagging track seems more appropriate based on the surrounding data. The adjacent ways 319206290, 319206294, and 319206299 were marked as track by Russ and are identical in appearance.