PostaMap_Infinite's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184674767 | ***Hotel not Restaurant lol |
|
| 183479455 | Will continue to update further |
|
| 183325481 | ||
| 175423731 | As a quick note: you can square buildings in the ID editor by pressing Q while an area is selected. I would highly recommend you square buildings you add, as it improves the quality of the map data and makes it better represent reality! While things like these may seem unimportant, our goal of making a holistic, accurate representation of the world relies on ensuring that the little details don't remain unaccounted for. |
|
| 175423731 | Hello Ironfractal! I have made some changes to the retail area you have edited to better match OSM best practices. My changeset was changeset/182456352#map=17/29.802159/-98.417823 . Please let me know if you have any questions! |
|
| 163464445 | Hey Redwood12, Thanks for the note! I’ll use this advice! |
|
| 163970465 | So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging. Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses. Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags! This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes. If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain! |
|
| 163970457 | So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging. Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses. Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags! This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes. If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain! |
|
| 163967569 | So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging. Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses. Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags! This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes. If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain! |
|
| 163967565 | So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging. Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses. Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags! This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes. If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain! |
|
| 163388630 | *2000 |
|
| 163383749 | Added unmapped features, fixing areas and feature details, improving waterways to be more accurate, fixing forest areas, and residential areas, improving parking and way tagging, and more! |
|
| 162489980 | Sorry, I mean’t golfcart=yes to golfcart=designated. Oops! |
|
| 162269001 | If you would like to verify: Here's a changeset viewer! https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162269001#16/29.6843/-98.4684 You can see which houses I edited, and which boundaries shifted a bit to prevent intersections. |
|
| 161548082 | Wrong changeset description! I combined an address node and a building |
|
| 150014718 | Hey, Jaggylore97! I was a bit confused when I saw a parking space named "Ray's Parking Lot." Could you please elaborate what this is? Is this a reserved parking spot for a patron? |
|
| 161501035 | Hello, finelab2! Nice job on your first changeset! You did great with the mapping! Just keep in mind that tennis courts cannot be grouped under one area. They must all be mapped separately. Other than that, nice job! |
|
| 161497807 | Hey, Zach777! Nice job with your 16th changeset! You marked this edit with the request for review, and in general you did great! Just keep in mind to try to not abbreviate the street suffix, (ie: St or Ct) and just type it full length (Cedric Court). This is to help streamline data. Otherwize, you did awesome! Keep mapping! Here's a guide on best practice for mapping:
|
|
| 161477744 | I will mark the location of my specific edit with an OSM Note explaining the edit, with the changeset as the title. and showing the description of the Osmose issue. Please let me know if I made a mistake and feel free to revert my edit. |
|
| 158308074 | I updated the building to it's current shape. |