PluMGMK's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137581649 | 20 days ago | Ah OK, I guess it's much less complicated than I thought! |
| 146229501 | about 2 months ago | Ah, fantastic, it's from April! Believe it or not, I was just about to start looking at this again, so this works out quite well! Thanks! :) |
| 147346648 | 2 months ago | Oops, copy-paste error I guess! Come to think of it, shouldn't all the 110-kV hardware in the Dublin area be marked as ESB Networks rather than EirGrid, since it's considered "distribution" there? I assume Nangor falls within that designation, since it's a child station of Inchicore (or was until Castlebaggot was built anyway)… |
| 167976934 | 4 months ago | Morning! As far as I know it's 400 kV and then there will be a transformer at Knoxkraha (Gogganstown) to bring it down to 220kV. Not sure why, but that's what the public info seems to say... |
| 145855568 | 4 months ago | Must be... I'm guessing I had circuits=4 on an earlier rev and forgot to change it. The real problem is that I was too lazy to map the individual circuits, which I've been meaning to rectify for well over a year now! 😦 |
| 171516979 | 4 months ago | Oops, typo! Should be guyed=yes
|
| 163590388 | 5 months ago | Hmm. I guess I assumed that the old 2-MVA T41 was (at least temporarily) wired up to the new GIS buildings, but now that you mention it that doesn't make much sense. The new 5-MVA T42 was already on-site before the old busbars were removed, so it's unlikely that the old transformers were ever connected to the new switchgear. I need to go and have another look at the station anyway because I think it's been further upgraded since I last mapped it… |
| 157268434 | 7 months ago | Aha, thanks for the heads-up! So the new 400-kV station is being built to the east, not in that little empty corner like I had assumed… |
| 160735391 | 12 months ago | Hi Daniel, thanks for reaching out! No, I'm pretty sure this pole has a recloser (automatic switch) on it. You can see on "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" that it has an elongated cylinder (the recloser itself) near the top, and then a little rectangle further down (the control panel / handle). It's a normally-open switch separating a feeder from Lee Bridge (to the north) from a different feeder from Hartnetts Cross (to the south). The pole you highlighted is a branch point, which may or may not have ordinary AIS mechanical switches on it, but it would be very unusual to have a recloser on a branch pole – that'd be a lot of gear to hang on a single support structure! I hope this clarifies things :) Best regards,
|
| 146881477 | almost 2 years ago | Hello! I haven't seen it up close, but from what I can make out from the aerial imagery, I think it must be. The pylon just looks like a normal end mast, and the nearby double-poles are normal suspension ones, so there don't seem to be any dedicated branching masts. From what I've seen elsewhere that seems to be the way these 110-kV branches are usually done… |
| 141700382 | about 2 years ago | Oh yes, I noticed that, I thought I'd fixed all of them! Silly iD autocompletes to steel, then changes to stone before I even realize it… |
| 138345286 | over 2 years ago | Hello there! Are you sure the 33kV-to-110kV transformer is ref T101? That sounds more like a code for a 10kV-to-110kV transformer… |
| 138957884 | over 2 years ago | Aha, good catch! There's also the case of the one in Rathgoggin that definitely got replaced with a bigger kiosk inside the fence, but retained its old ref number (this one: node/11076129393). I think it makes sense that there are just two transformers inside the building, but it's considered a single station? I noticed something similar the other day (way/106564946) where there are two different names and ref numbers (which I unfortunately failed to memorize or record) on the door. |
| 138583721 | over 2 years ago | Hello! Looks like it was put on the map over ten years ago: changeset/15524207
|
| 137184247 | over 2 years ago | Gotcha, thanks for the info! Indeed, I think I realized my mistake with the minor/major distinction pretty soon. Did I miss some that I had misclassified? The abandoned / demolished concept makes a lot of sense, I should have realized that sooner… |