Hello,
Thank you for adding all those detials! Please note that natural=tree can only be used on the trees themselves, not on the area that the tree is standing on. I have fixed this already, so don't worry.
Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello Wasila,
as you continue to add all those Zoom Room locations, please take some time to read through this feedback:

- Please do NOT use any building=* tags when the place is inside a building that is already mapped, like a mall. building=commercial does not mean that the place is inside a commercial building, but that it's the building itself, in which case two overlapping buildings exist. building=* tags on a dog training facility only makes sense if the whole building is the dog training building, which in most instances is not the case, as they are often in malls or other bigger buildings.
- If you don't know the exact shape of the dog training place inside the building, just add it as a node instead of a polygon shape. As you can tell, most places inside malls are mapped that way. It is okay to also map dog training places as shapes, but if you do, please make them actually the shape of the business.
- Please use dog=designated on the places you map. dog=yes means that dogs are allowed there, dog=designated means that it's a place made for dogs, which is obviously true in the places you map. It is never correct to use dogs.
- Add amenity=animal_training and animal_training=dog to your places. Adding them consistently makes it easy to, for example, find all the dog training facilities in a certain city, which is the whole point of making this map.

Over the last 24h, I had to make countless edits to clear up your mistakes. Missing animal_training=dog tags are not a huge deal, that's more about data quality, but especially the badly drawn building outlines that overlap with actual buildings (point 1) and to a lesser degree, the usage of dogs instead of dog, cause a lot of work for me.

Best
Jonas

Dear Wasila,
thank you for adding all those dog training facilities!
I have a few suggestions on how to map them more accurately:
If you add amenity=animal_training, they appear on the map as animal training centers.
Furthermore, you can use dog=designated (instead of dog=yes) to show that dogs are not only allowed, but it is a facility especially made for dogs. Please also note that the correct tag is dog, not dogs. Using the singular form is a bit un-intuitive, but that's how it got established on OSM and that's what people and services who seach for dog friendly places expect.
Last but not least, please don't add business inside buildings like malls as thier own buildings. The building=yes tag is not required, a better way to show a dog training place inside a mall is by just adding the info to a single node. That's how all the stores, restaurants and other places inside the mall appear as points on the map.
Feel free to reach out if you have any further questions!

Thanks and happy mapping!
Jonas

Hello,
Thank you for adding all the walking routes!
Please note that the correct tag to use is dog, not dogs. See dog=*.
I fixed them already, so don't worry, but please keep this in mind for future additions.

Thank you and happy mapping!

Hallo,
was genau ist bei relation/13774317/history/1 mit men=explaining gemeint? Ist das ein Schreibfehler oder haben tatsächlich Männer irgendwas erklärt?

Vielen Dank!

Hallo,
diese Änderung hat einige Telefonnummern von phone=+49... zu male=+49... geändert. Teilweise wurden bestehende male tags dadurch überschrieben. Ich räume das gerade manuell auf, es sind ja zum Glück nur eine Hand voll Objekte, aber bitte für zukünftige Änderungen beachten.

Danke und frohes Mappen!

No worries! It is counter intuitive to use the singular form, so I get why people use dogs.

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

Здравствуйте,
спасибо за ваше редактирование! Пожалуйста, в будущем уделяйте время написанию корректных комментариев к наборам изменений, чтобы другим было легче понять, что именно вы сделали.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Спасибо и удачного картографирования!

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
I found this place as part of my cleanup of wrong or weird tags, in this case related to golf. The node that was supposed to be the pin was tagged golf=pin;tee, which obviously doesn't make sense, so I moved over the tee part to the correct node, honestly not thinking about the issue about the tee node being inside the tee box area, or looking at its history.
I don't think it matters too much, I think the node being tagged as well as the area doesn't hurt, although I can see your argument and it makes sense to have it consistent at last within one golf course, if not world wide. So feel free to remove the tag again. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I get your point about the pin being placed randomly aswell, but everyone who cares about golf and looks at this map will know that it is not a correct placement, almomst by definition. But maybe it is more of a fool proof and machine readable way to say "this is the play direction of this hole". Same with how shop or restaurant nodes within buildings are placed randomly somewhere inside the store/restaurant area.

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for your edit! When mapping buildings, you can make them rectangular by hitting Q on your keyboard when having it selected.
Also please note that name = House is not the right way to tag this, because the building is not actually named house, it just IS a house. So the correct way to tag it would just be building = house.
Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for adding those buildings! You can make them rectangular by hitting Q on your keyboard when having them selected.
Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping

Hello,
I see that you requested a review. Your changes were very good. One additional tip for mapping houses is making all the corners rectangular. In the iD editor (the one you used), you can do that by selecting a house and hitting Q on your keyboard.
Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hi,
I see that you requested a review. To answer your question: Roundabouts don't usually have names (unless they are big enough and have their own addresses) so it is correct not to use the name tag here. See junction=roundabout. You can even use noname = yes to signify that it really does not have a name. See noname=yes for that.
So I would in that case also remove the name = Knalhuttenweg tag from the western semi circle of the bike path.
Other than that, your change set was really good! Thank you and happy mapping!

No worries! It is quite a common mistake.