Some sections of this road are still marked one-way, is that correct?

On the linked website:
The page title is "The Church In Boise"
The first sentence uses "The church in Boise, Idaho"
The address in the footer uses "The church in Boise"

The wiki for Key:name says it should usually be the "most prominent signposted name".

The sign on the building reads "a meeting place of the church in Boise", which seems more like a description than a name

but then again, they don't use it consistently and actually claim to not believe in names?

Regarding way/679643961: lowercase "church" appears to be the official name

Your changeset touched over 400 nodes and spans a few continents, this seems a little more than minor

Hi, welcome to OSM! I see you've created an area for Fred Meyer. There was already a point for it, you should remove that when replacing it. It would also be nice to have the parking lot tagged with an amenity=parking area.

What does this comment mean?

Is way/663558350 necessary? I assume the Pedestrian Area would cover routing here

ignore the nonsense source, this was submitted by a cat

For routing purposes, paths should connect to roads where it makes sense. The path near Goldenrod Avenue looks like it should be connected

Is way/738910796 actually a water=reservoir? It looks like a building

You seem to have drawn roads through Albertsons, this seems unlikely to be accurate

Streetlevel imagery shows a fence, is this actually connected?

This looks more like a parking lot

This road looks rather small, does it actually qualify as a residential road?

From what I can tell, this was at least formerly part of John Booth Memorial Park. The city website appears not to acknowledge the Royal Boulevard extension on its park map

Is there not a traffic signal here?

Maybe not, I wasn't sure exactly how to tag it

Name tags should represent a name of the object, not a description. "Gazebo" sounds like the latter