PerplexingPenguins's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 73254654 | almost 2 years ago | I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case especially for that road lol |
| 146429251 | almost 2 years ago | or oh this is about new roads isn't it |
| 146429251 | almost 2 years ago | apparently old projects get auto-removed so this is a new one |
| 111361641 | almost 3 years ago | must have forgotten to straighten those or are you referring to something else? |
| 117764882 | over 3 years ago | Is East Pennsylvania Lane supposed to be disconnected from Pennsylvania Drive? |
| 97921654 | almost 4 years ago | Looks like you've changed North Harris Ranch Road to South Harris Ranch Road in this changeset, is that intentional/correct? |
| 106719698 | over 4 years ago | I see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2988 but it was closed |
| 106719698 | over 4 years ago | Given that this changeset was created with StreetComplete, I'm not sure that's really their choice. Probably should be reported to StreetComplete as an issue |
| 103558069 | over 4 years ago | also, where did you find newer aerial imagery? |
| 103558069 | over 4 years ago | Spring Creek does meet Dry Creek at an angle: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gsGdhURYLrXiNvcjG3EcWr possibly temporary, but it _is_ paved |
| 103558069 | over 4 years ago | I believe it does, this is from a gpx track of driving on it |
| 99415106 | almost 5 years ago | note that for the purposes of this project, mapping sidewalks also includes any curbs at crossings |
| 99399469 | almost 5 years ago | no, this is all from imagery, I think the gpx file is a side effect of the way that damn opens iD |
| 97649286 | almost 5 years ago | What is the source for this data? |
| 97013883 | almost 5 years ago | don't really have any, was just making up tags in this case |
| 77204212 | almost 5 years ago | Looks like we have mapillary images here that show the name - corrected |
| 96359245 | almost 5 years ago | I think going with the signage would be better here as that's what's "on the ground" |
| 77204212 | almost 5 years ago | it's entirely possible that's wrong, probably worth surveying here again anyway to get the new streets |
| 89755279 | over 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM! To make this pathway more useful, it should be tagged with a feature type (probably highway=path) and connected to other paths & roads |
| 89059222 | over 5 years ago | I would recommend against doing this, changesets over a large area are hard to review |