OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158228877 about 1 year ago

AgusQui,
We have adjusted how we are treating these arrows. You may still run in to some restrictions at said intersections that were added a couple of days ago but hopefully not from yesterday.

157978284 about 1 year ago

AgusQui,
I wonder if you have older imagery? I have imagery that shows Avenida exists where you removed it. And while Avenida might be not be signed on one block, it will be on the next- it is intermittently signed Avenida. Also "Avenida" isn't confined to only existing on dual carriageways.
I encourage you to consider adding Avenida back to the rest of Mariano Acosta based on what's in our imagery.
Our imagery is currently being uploaded to Mapillary and will be available soon.

Let me know if you have any other questions!

158053043 about 1 year ago

Hi AgusQui,
It would be greatly helpful if you could provide us with some documentation that turns on straight white arrows are permitted in Argentina. Typically a straight white arrow means turns aren't permitted in the rest of the world, but with your access to local legislation we could have a better understanding of how this road paint is to be interpreted.
Thank you!

107995946 over 1 year ago

Hello, Mateusz Koniesczny,
You are correct that bus=designated would work as well as bus=yes. Neither are incorrect but bus=designation may be more common.
Pegasus21

139312193 over 2 years ago

Hi 5m4u6,
I moved the name of this tunnel from description to tunnel:name.
Pegasus21

139318852 over 2 years ago

Good morning 5m4u6,
Due to your local knowledge, I added bicycle=yes and foot=yes to the gate and way of Calle San Javier.
Pegasus21

134464435 over 2 years ago

Thanks, we'll try to stay aware of street names on shops and name appropriately.
Cheers, Pegasus21

134464435 over 2 years ago

Do you have a link to a government resource for street names so that we can avoid adjusting street names incorrectly in the future?
Thanks, Pegasus21

134471180 over 2 years ago

We map according to ground imagery to ensure safety and accuracy of what the municipality has determined.
As for adding restrictions, we add what we see in the ground imagery because we can confirm it. The reason we add those is because it's determined by the local municipality.
We don't add them to clutter the map, we add them to improve the routing and to ensure the safety of users.
Regards, Pegasus21

134471180 over 2 years ago

Here is a link to the ground footage where the no_u_turn restriction is visible. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=11.58336&lng=104.900178&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=656602739802377

Even if no u turns are implied, it helps to add the restrictions in order to prevent the u turn. If some navigation software doesn’t process that information then it shouldn’t disrupt their routing. Other softwares do process no u turns restrictions, so it would be important to add them for those types of routing software.

134464435 over 2 years ago

The boarder between street 273 and street 70 made sense to split at a major intersection. It is rare to see road names abruptly change along a road without a change in direction or somewhere other than an intersection. Also, the admin boundary usually follows a road which it does in this case. This boundary cuts through houses so I assumed it was offset so I made the split between Street 273 and Street 70 at the junction of Street 100.

134498563 over 2 years ago

I have been modifying footway classifications since they are used by motorcycles and tuk tuks but are too small for motor cars to traverse. Footways do not allow vehicle traffic routing in any way. In order to allow motorcycles, bicycles, and tuk tuks the classification needs to be corrected and vehicle restrictions added.

130622416 almost 3 years ago

Thank you for bringing this up to me! I have changed it back to it's previous name.
Pegasus21

115887380 about 3 years ago

Hi monooo, I made the changes that you suggested but if you are using ID editor those changes may not show up for a day or so. Let me know if anything looks incorrect after tomorrow or the next day.
Thanks, Pegasus21

115887380 about 3 years ago

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have edited the area in question. Please let me know if it is not accurate. Thanks again, Pegasus21

121102030 over 3 years ago

Hi, Thanks for bringing this mistake to my attention. I will try to be more cognizant of this in the future.
Have a great day!
Pegasus21

120513886 over 3 years ago

Carfog81, Thanks for bringing this to my attention- I will try to be more careful.

118034949 almost 4 years ago

Hi, thank you for bringing this to my attention! Pegasus21

114900082 about 4 years ago

Hi mueschel, Thanks for letting me know! Hopefully I finally found all of them. And once again, please let me know if you find anything else
Take care,
Lauren

114900082 about 4 years ago

Hi mueschel,
I have corrected the "impicit" tags that I could find. Please let me know if you find anything else that needs attention.
Have a great day,
Lauren