@Makeena, I'm glad you have your owpinion.

However I'm pretty sure that the community will trust more the 360° geotagged images that are publicly available than the opinion of a user.

The geotagged image clearly show a path, therefore the tag is fixed.

changeset/187430331#map=19/47.355434/8.494835&layers=G

If you have even more trustworthy source, you're welcome to share it :)

@makeena My understanding is that the consensus is that you edited the path and set it to a "track" based on an incorrect assumptions. Therefore I'm reverting it to the previously known correct state, meaning before you did the edits.

Of course if you are genuinly sure about the tags and have a source for it, you're welcome to add them again.

I'll drop off from this discussion thread since in my view we clarified everything

@makeena you're referring to another discussion. Here the topic is about the wrong tag.

I've fixed the tag, added the link to the panoramax image and reverted the access tags as they used to be before you did the edit:
way/47984671/history/5

These images were recorded as a sequence with a 360° camera and are geotagged. So they are the source of truth in my view.

I really don't get it. Is my understanding correct that you looked at what the past users set in order to decide if it a path or a track?

Have you used any other source? Like surveying, or looking at the panoramax sequence, which covers that path?

Hi, I'm the user who added the panoramax images. I agree I did a mistake, the image I linked was on the wrong part of the path. However why do you claim that I was never on the path?

I surveyed it and even added 360 images that you can see on panoramax:
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;pc64f5e61-71d8-4040-9091-2fb5e37fde51;c224.88/14.96/0;m18.13/47.355805/8.495187;vd;bs;udefault

On this panoramax sequence you can see the path that we are discussing here.

If the panoramax ID or link doesn't work on your side, I would feel it more constructive to notify it to me rather than claiming I've never been there

I think you didn't read my question ;)

Hey, I uploaded the 360 images of the paths, so yes I surveyed it ;)

Both images are working well on my side, I suppose you're pointing out that you can't see one of the trace?

The integration of Panoramax was a big buggy and required a manual copy of the ID, thus the wrong path edited, thanks for pointing it out (in your own way...)

Why tagged grass as surface for this path?
way/47984671/history

Had to be corrected here:
changeset/184700737