OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
91388853 over 5 years ago

Hi! Changes that you made looks suspicious for me (WAY:850616738 name=Las Tetas). Could you please provide truthful sources of information about the correctness of your edits?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91388853

84981537 over 5 years ago

Hi! Are you completely sure that new shape of landuse residential is more appropriate than deleted one?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84981537

84770989 over 5 years ago

Hi! Could you please provide more details about your edits? It doesn't look like park on satellite images
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84770989

84539840 over 5 years ago

Hi! could you please provide more details what is the reason of removing Feldman's neighbourhood name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84539840

84539478 over 5 years ago

Hi! I think that WAY: 799235643 should be closed polygon or part of relation to have landuse=residential tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84539478

84526784 over 5 years ago

Hi! Could you please provide more details about this military area? I don't see anything on the satellite image and for me you edits look fictional.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84526784

84263622 over 5 years ago

I think it's not necessary to delete all these areas you have drawn. You could leave tag amenity=monastery but remove building=yes from these polygons.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

Also you can use JOSM for editing instead of ID. It allows to use more opportunities like filtering and mass editing.
osm.wiki/JOSM/Guide
osm.wiki/JOSM/FAQ
Good luck!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

OSMcha is one of the easiest ways to fond all edits from particular user https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Leoaye%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Leoaye%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

Here is some useful links about mapping religion amenities. I believe that they could be useful.
osm.wiki/RU:Key:amenity
amenity=place_of_worship
osm.wiki/Key%3Amonastery%3Atype
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

Here is some useful links about mapping religion amenities. I believe that they could be useful.
osm.wiki/RU:Key:amenity
amenity=place_of_worship
osm.wiki/Key%3Amonastery%3Atype
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

Thank you for quick response!
Seems like standard OSM map doesn't show such kind of amenity. But data is still inside and you can use use it for searching and other purposes.
Religious features is a part of thematic mapping.
https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog585/node/738
Thematic mapping is used for creation new parallel project like these:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects
I hope that you could find projects related with religious features.

Why do you want to highlight monasteries amenities? Is is for better identification on OSM? Here are some ways how to do this:
- You can map every particular buildings in amenity area.
- If you know the names please add them to the amenities. It will create a POI (label with the name). So identification could be much easier.
- Add node (POI) with info that was described above. Here is an example node/307728708#map=19/41.68989/44.61131
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

84263622 over 5 years ago

Hey! I see that you've added tag building to monastery amenity. Please don't do that - that create huge overlapping building area. I think amenity tag should be enough for such cases.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84263622

83964048 over 5 years ago

It's a vandalism
edits were reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83964048

83896700 over 5 years ago

Hi! you re-tagged all the features to the highway=residential. It doesn't seem a valid edit
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83896700

83314320 over 5 years ago

Hi! Your edits looks like fictional. Could you please provide some ground truth about them? In other case they would be reverted
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83314320

82020987 almost 6 years ago

Hi! Could you please provide any details about your edits? They seem fictional
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82020987

81080133 almost 6 years ago

Hi! Seems as if your edits created dragged nodes. I've reverted your changeset
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81080133

80111912 almost 6 years ago

Seems like you've removed a neighbourhood. Could you please provide more details about the reasons of your actions?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80111912

80015504 almost 6 years ago

Your changeset was reverted because of mass deletion. See RELATION: 6050917
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80015504