Correction: Source used was MGP Pro 2025-08-11

Correction: imagery used was MGP Pro 2025-06-07

Correction: Source used was ESRI World Imagery

Correction: Source used was ESRI World Imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169068606

Correction: Source used was MGP Pro 2025-05-17

Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-03-27

Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-02-17.

Correction: Source used was Strava.

Correction: Source used was MGP Pro 2025-01-21

Correction: Source used was MGP Pro 2025-01-21

Correction: Source used was Bing SS

Correction: Source used was Mapillary

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.

Correction: Source used was MSW 2024-02-13

Correction: Source used was ESRI World Imagery.

Hi vanagaudi,
My intention was to indicate that while these roads connected various towns and locales, they appeared to be difficult to travel without off-roading capabilities. With that in mind, would it be worth adding surface tags to some of these instead of reclassifying?

Thank you for your reclassifications so far, I see that there are a few main connections that haven’t been changed back to tertiary. Namely way/988543578, way/988541976, way/988543577 and way/988527837. I have changed these back, but there may be others, so I will defer to any more classification changes you make in the area.

Thank you for the information! I responded more thoroughly on changeset/155347797

Hi vanagaudi, Thank you for the information. I can add the tracks back that were removed. As an additional note, it may be worth adding intermittent or seasonal tags to the tracks in this area. I am not sure which roads these tags would apply to, though. It would be helpful for any future users that may edit in the area if you are able to add this information. Have a great day!

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-06-27

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-06-02