NumisK's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175828291 | 9 days ago | Merci pour cette explication Benoît, je comprends. Bonne journée. |
| 175828291 | 12 days ago | Hi Benoît C MdP, thank you for reverting the changeset. I made the edits after seeing vehicles on the road on BDOrtho IGN imagery. Upon further inspection, I saw the Panoramax imagery for the south end of the street with the pedestrian sign, also the text “Circulation interdite aux véhicules motorisés sauf desserte interne” below.
|
| 174810601 | about 1 month ago | Hi Aya Samir, I used TomTom proprietary GPS traces on my edit. I have made the corrections per your suggestion and will be more cautious when interpreting my data sources. Thank you for your feedback. |
| 173608774 | 2 months ago | Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out. I have rewieved the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and here it seems from the satellite imagery that drivers need to enter the lanes of the roundabout in order to continue towards the next section. So I think connecting the segments to the junction on different nodes would be an improvement in this specific case. Please let me know what you think. I will be happy to discuss and widen my understanding. |
| 173609092 | 2 months ago | Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition. |
| 173608774 | 2 months ago | Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you |
| 173609092 | 2 months ago | Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you |
| 165636343 | 6 months ago | Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
| 165636343 | 6 months ago | Hello ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for mapping!
|
| 165617865 | 8 months ago | Hi muralito, Thank you for making the corrections to my edits. I will refer to this example when making edits in similar situations. |
| 165617865 | 8 months ago | Hi muralito, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
| 162875670 | 8 months ago | Hello Simon Peter Makobi, Thank you for your contribution! I have removed the untagged polygon way/1362475677. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping! |
| 162916867 | 8 months ago | Hello Nesim, thank You for your contribution in Turkey - Duplicated Highways challenge. Make sure that you edit scope of the task - remove duplicated highway before adjusting it to imagery layer. Happy Mapping! |
| 150789712 | over 1 year ago | Thank you Syl for your feedback. I will compare available Imagery references and use appropriate and the latest ones for editing. |
| 150789712 | over 1 year ago | Hi syl, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
| 150784094 | over 1 year ago | Thank you Syl for your feedback. I will be more cautious while performing the edits going further. |
| 139023810 | over 2 years ago | Thank you for flagging this, I can see now and look like JOSM behaving weird here. Ideally when adding junction=roundabout no need to add oneway tag, accordingly I removed the oneway tag and I was under assumption that JOSM would take it correctly from the backend. My bad! I Learned a lot here 🙂 |
| 123750045 | over 3 years ago | Hi willkmis, thanks for reaching out. I was trying to add a few nodes to improve the alignment of the highway. |