Hi keyyushi,

Thank you for your feedback. I have reassessed my edit and I agree with your point. Changeset reverted, and I will take extra care in my future edits on this.

Merci pour cette explication Benoît, je comprends. Bonne journée.

Hi Benoît C MdP, thank you for reverting the changeset. I made the edits after seeing vehicles on the road on BDOrtho IGN imagery. Upon further inspection, I saw the Panoramax imagery for the south end of the street with the pedestrian sign, also the text “Circulation interdite aux véhicules motorisés sauf desserte interne” below.
access=* tells that motor_vehicle=* tag can be used with highway=pedestrian. So I’m thinking either motor_vehicle=destination or motor_vehicle=delivery can be added to the way. Please let me know if it’s something you would agree with.
All the best.

Hi Aya Samir,

I used TomTom proprietary GPS traces on my edit. I have made the corrections per your suggestion and will be more cautious when interpreting my data sources. Thank you for your feedback.

Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out. I have rewieved the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and here it seems from the satellite imagery that drivers need to enter the lanes of the roundabout in order to continue towards the next section. So I think connecting the segments to the junction on different nodes would be an improvement in this specific case. Please let me know what you think. I will be happy to discuss and widen my understanding.

Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.

Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hello ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for mapping!
While working on Canada - Add roundabout tag you added superfluous oneway tag. I removed that from all of your edits. Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

Hi muralito, Thank you for making the corrections to my edits.  I will refer to this example when making edits in similar situations.  

Hi muralito, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hello Simon Peter Makobi, Thank you for your contribution! I have removed the untagged polygon way/1362475677. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!

Hello Nesim, thank You for your contribution in Turkey - Duplicated Highways challenge. Make sure that you edit scope of the task - remove duplicated highway before adjusting it to imagery layer. Happy Mapping!

Thank you Syl for your feedback. I will compare available Imagery references and use appropriate and the latest ones for editing.

Hi syl, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Thank you Syl for your feedback. I will be more cautious while performing the edits going further.

Thank you for flagging this, I can see now and look like JOSM behaving weird here. Ideally when adding junction=roundabout no need to add oneway tag, accordingly I removed the oneway tag and I was under assumption that JOSM would take it correctly from the backend. My bad! I Learned a lot here 🙂

Hi willkmis, thanks for reaching out. I was trying to add a few nodes to improve the alignment of the highway.