NicaTopo's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168684179 | Please use nodes for geographic features without clear boundaries. |
|
| 160412980 | You added a lot of building not matching the Bing satellite imagery and often overlapping existing building shapes. I'm going to delete them all. Please work more carefully |
|
| 152334383 | Hi ChocLover,
Thank you |
|
| 156485893 | Drich,
Thanks for contributing to OSM Nicaragua. |
|
| 156487388 | Hi Weltrr,
|
|
| 156481314 | Hi Kristel,
|
|
| 95106716 | Hi nenemini,
Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua. |
|
| 153339939 | Steve, Please stop adding crazy building shapes. Generally 99% of the buildings are SQUARE! You can square them out in the iD editor. I have to revert you additions. |
|
| 153286030 | Hi,
|
|
| 152989696 | Hi,
There were some crappy buildings in this area before, don't add more crappy buildings to it. Thank you. |
|
| 153307799 | Amine,
|
|
| 153309095 | Hi Hormolorlah,
|
|
| 153308869 | Hi Hormorlah,
Thanks. |
|
| 153296396 | Hi Shashank, Please narrow down the shapes of your buildings to match exactly the aerial imagery. Do not combine clearly separate buildings into one shape. Thank you,
|
|
| 153296503 | Hi,
Thank you |
|
| 153253706 | Hi, Please square out all building shapes. More than 99% are square.
Michael |
|
| 153265010 | I'm reverting your additions. |
|
| 153265010 | Hi Judyann, Please match with your building shapes exactly the satellite imagery and square out all buildings. Thank you. |
|
| 153166438 | Vandalism. Buildings far too big compared to aerial imagery. |
|
| 153165863 | Vandalism. Buildings far too big compared to aerial imagery. |