NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179922846 | Hi Josue 12, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
|
| 179922358 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 8 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179920489 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 17 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179919848 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Computer store" #MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179917993 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 29 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179917501 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Biuro nieruchomości Ryunek 18"
#MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179915136 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 14 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179914615 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179913593 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Consultant office"
#MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179913335 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Agence d'entreprises"
#MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179911939 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 10 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179911611 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179909577 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Learning center" #MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179908283 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 126 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179907454 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tour departure point" #MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179904799 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 37 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179899989 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Concrete company" #MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179898164 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 9 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
|
| 179895706 | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Residence building" #MapWithoutSpam |
|
| 179890698 | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 33 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|