Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 123% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=191892520

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 4 of your recent changesets, involving 1,378 map changes:
- Modified highway=* (1,478)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 236 of your recent changesets, involving 33,088 map changes:
- Added surface=* (937)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 311 of your recent changesets, involving 2,850 map changes:
- Added oneway=* (552), surface=* (497), smoothness=* (319), restriction=* (307), type=* (307), +6 more
- Modified highway=* (598), foot=* (122), bicycle=* (104)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 15 of your recent changesets, involving 3,897 map changes:
- Added natural=* (882)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 15 of your recent changesets, involving 1,323 map changes:
- Added highway=* (210), oneway=* (112)
- Modified highway=* (420)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 3 of your recent changesets, involving 2,707 map changes:
- Removed highway=* (538), surface=* (405), source=* (248), name=* (170)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hi 👋

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 477 of your recent changesets, involving 478 map changes:
- Added name:crh-Cyrl=* (475), name:crh=* (391)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

#LargeScaleEdits

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14372704488 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Hi 👋

I'm an automated OSM monitoring bot.

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 12 of your recent changesets, involving 857 map changes:
- Added ref=* (483)
- Modified ref=* (602), name=* (144)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

Hi 👋

I'm an automated OSM quality monitoring bot.

I noticed a pattern of large-scale edits across 10 of your recent changesets, involving 6,231 map changes:
- Added addr:suburb=* (1,777), addr:state=* (1,777), addr:housenumber=* (1,768), addr:street=* (1,768), natural=* (565)

These changes may be part of a systematic or automated editing process. This is not necessarily a problem, but I'd like to better understand how these updates were made.

Could you briefly explain the purpose of these modifications and whether they were performed manually or using an automated process?

Thanks.

Welcome, and thanks for contributing!

While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node.

The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cross other ways without sharing a common node, or introduce unusual shapes such as sharp bends, zigzags, or abrupt changes in direction.

⚠️️ Potentially affected element(s):
node/274907569 v5
way/673319746 | External Crossing
way/673342307 | External Crossing
way/673319776 | External Crossing
way/671913224 | External Crossing
way/673319687 | External Crossing
way/673319749 | External Crossing
way/673319722 | External Crossing
way/645606832 | External Crossing
way/673319628 | External Crossing
way/673319725 | External Crossing
way/673319632 | External Crossing
way/1153289256 | External Crossing
way/673319735 | External Crossing
way/673319643 | External Crossing
way/673319707 | External Crossing
way/673319641 | External Crossing
way/673319742 | External Crossing
way/673319743 | External Crossing
way/673319775 | External Crossing
way/673319708 | External Crossing
way/673319740 | External Crossing
way/672987490 | External Crossing
way/673319741 | External Crossing
way/25212397 v11 | Sharp Bend
way/25212472 v7 | Sharp Bend

Could you please take a moment to review the geometry and check whether the changes reflect the actual situation on the ground?

If everything looks correct, no changes are necessary. A short reply here would be appreciated.

#WayGeometryCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=191889334

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14372371556 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Welcome, and thanks for contributing!

While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node.

The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cross other ways without sharing a common node, or introduce unusual shapes such as sharp bends, zigzags, or abrupt changes in direction.

⚠️️ Potentially affected element(s):
node/7141251830 v2
way/704371869 | External Crossing
way/449592215 | External Crossing
way/763227389 v7 | Sharp Bend

Could you please take a moment to review the geometry and check whether the changes reflect the actual situation on the ground?

If everything looks correct, no changes are necessary. A short reply here would be appreciated.

#WayGeometryCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=191883002

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14372287018 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14372295418 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14371959290 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Object to review:
node/14371989734 v1

Could you please review the relevant text and revise it if needed?

ℹ️ Please note that description=* is optional. If the existing tags already describe the feature sufficiently, you can simply leave it out.

#PromotionalTextReview

Welcome, and thanks for contributing!

While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node.

The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cross other ways without sharing a common node, or introduce unusual shapes such as sharp bends, zigzags, or abrupt changes in direction.

⚠️️ Potentially affected element(s):
node/12071179911 v2
way/352939963 | External Crossing
way/352939954 | External Crossing
way/1177162166 v2 | Sharp Bend

Could you please take a moment to review the geometry and check whether the changes reflect the actual situation on the ground?

If everything looks correct, no changes are necessary. A short reply here would be appreciated.

#WayGeometryCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=191875124

Welcome, and thanks for contributing!

While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node.

The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cross other ways without sharing a common node, or introduce unusual shapes such as sharp bends, zigzags, or abrupt changes in direction.

⚠️️ Potentially affected element(s):
node/1401060955 v3
way/126630042 v5 | Sharp Bend
way/444834132 v2 | Sharp Bend

Could you please take a moment to review the geometry and check whether the changes reflect the actual situation on the ground?

If everything looks correct, no changes are necessary. A short reply here would be appreciated.

#WayGeometryCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=191873170