OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176648803 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
node/13419037341 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartment complex in Monrovia CA near downtown LA"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176643912 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
node/13418768963 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Sala de ensaio para músicos com gravação musical no Centro Comercial Stop"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual da sua descrição poderia ser: "Sala de ensaio para músicos com gravação musical no Centro Comercial Stop"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176642330 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
node/13278488036 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Beauty services in Guntersville"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176637144 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
way/442077399 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance agency in Madison Indiana"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176623536 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
way/372255013 v6

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hotel para adultos en primera línea de playa de Calpe"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Hotel para adultos en primera línea de playa de Calpe"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176623508 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
way/377204883 v6

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Climbing and fitness facility in former Art Deco cinema"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176623237 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
way/374391493 v6

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hotel en Calpe frente a la playa del Arenal Bol"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Hotel en Calpe frente a la playa del Arenal Bol"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176621226 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
way/435857062 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tent manufacturer in UAE and Saudi Arabia"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176620734 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
relation/20022967 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "CyberCore empresa de cybersécurité y infraestructura IT"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : "CyberCore entreprise de cybersécurité et d'infrastructure informatique"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176620450 16 days ago

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
node/12049999342 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT consulting firm"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description

176654762 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/562284689 v3 | 10 crossings
way/1249807363 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/5420710069 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654762

176654744 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/562284689 v3 | 6 crossings
way/563095966 v2 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/5420710088 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654744

176654612 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/209472314 v6 | 10 crossings
way/210939256 v2 | 10 crossings
way/935858598 v2 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/567738764 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654612

176653828 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/1460165050 v2 | 6 crossings
way/1460165054 v3 | 6 crossings
way/1460165047 v2 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176653828

176638393 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/9111173 v15 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/11124102566 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176638393

176635376 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/251128122 v6 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/9692152644 v3
node/2652334953 v2
node/2652334959 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176635376

176632416 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 153 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/1462654661 v2 | 34 crossings
way/1462695706 v4 | 29 crossings
way/1462620500 v5 | 26 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176632416

176629534 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 151 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/1462795390 v2 | 56 crossings
way/1462772225 v4 | 21 crossings
way/1462813158 v3 | 21 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176629534

176628366 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 172 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/1462695706 v3 | 29 crossings
way/1462322186 v9 | 24 crossings
way/1462813157 v3 | 24 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176628366

176625321 16 days ago

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 38 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
way/1462654660 v3 | 18 crossings
way/1462387401 v3 | 8 crossings
way/1462691366 v2 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176625321