NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 176086756 | 16 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Anzalone Drilling and Pumps LLC" #MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description |
| 176086440 | 16 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event and party rental company in Orlando area" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 176085743 | 16 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Water filtration facility" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 176094848 | 16 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176084689 | 16 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 15 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176075577 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 11 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176074880 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 15 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176073924 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 78 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176072261 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 8 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176069139 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 66 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176068958 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 39 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176059909 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 9 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176079122 | 17 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance office" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 176076686 | 17 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dog daycare and boarding facility in Knoxville" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 176073498 | 17 days ago | Hi RezGolf, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 176068823 | 17 days ago | Hi SaelBiritiba, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 176052268 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 9 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176036948 | 17 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 39 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176059269 | 17 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Window cleaning service in Pompano Beach" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 176053364 | 17 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Personal training studio in Scottsdale AZ" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |