NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175960730 | 25 days ago | Hi frimtears, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 175953896 | 25 days ago | Hi MercyObwoge, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 175948405 | 26 days ago | Hi 하이찬, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 175938069 | 26 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 12 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175931079 | 26 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 11 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175943980 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Window fashions store" #MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description |
| 175943468 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Community service center" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 175938911 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "salon services for hair care"
#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description |
| 175932746 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cleaning service in La Mesa" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 175940879 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 369 of your last 443 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you. Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake? #DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
|
| 175935032 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 368 of your last 459 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you. Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake? #DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
|
| 175922367 | 26 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Creative platform for website design" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 175928966 | 26 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 52 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175923074 | 26 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 13 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175920923 | 26 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 20 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175908692 | 27 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 15 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175902611 | 27 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 13 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 175891868 | 27 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "آزمایشگاه تشخیص طبی و مولکولی زرتشت ساعت کاری از شنبه تا چهارشنبه ۸:۰۰ الی ۱۸:۰۰ پنجشنبه ۸:۰۰ الی ۱۳:۰۰"
#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 175879548 | 27 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Crawl space repair service" #MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description |
| 175873160 | 27 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Oosterveld Heating and Air Conditioning" #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |