Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added department store with street, house number, postcode, and name details"

Hi dra_fer2000, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/116931527 v5 | crossings=7
way/1033116722 v2 | crossings=6
way/1033116721 v2 | crossings=4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174995387

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/1191052310 v7 | crossings=8
way/1191052309 v8 | crossings=8
way/1252674059 v3 | crossings=3

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/13323947060 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174985253

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/1191052309 v7 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/13323886113 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174984343

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/1191052310 v6 | crossings=8
way/1191052309 v7 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/13323899046 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174984191

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Merchant services company"

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and cooling service in Covington GA"

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital marketing agency near Salt Lake"

Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/719926036 v1 | crossings=16
way/614729087 v2 | crossings=4

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/5814358323 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174972325

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/392704188 v5 | crossings=5
way/259491444 v4 | crossings=4
way/397397067 v3 | crossings=4

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/3200766972 v4
node/2649179985 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174971837

Đây là một bình luận mẫu dựa trên chỉnh sửa bản đồ của bạn: "Thêm quán cà phê với chi tiết tòa nhà và tên"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cafe with building and name details"

Xin chào Bùi Việt Thắng, chào mừng đến với dự án OSM và cảm ơn vì đã đóng góp!

Để hợp tác dễ dàng hơn và giúp mọi người hiểu rõ về các chỉnh sửa của bạn, tốt nhất là thêm một mô tả ngắn gọn về những thay đổi mà bạn đã thực hiện. Các bình luận rõ ràng sẽ giúp cộng đồng theo dõi công việc của bạn và cung cấp phản hồi tốt hơn. Bạn có thể tìm thấy các mẹo về cách viết bình luận tốt tại đây[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Bùi Việt Thắng, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/532814211 v2 | crossings=8
way/227656384 v3 | crossings=5
way/91059243 v9 | crossings=5

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/1100751741 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174967839

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/1090957108 v1 | crossings=4
way/1090957096 v1 | crossings=3

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/9992476661 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174962389

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/1452565085 v4 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/13322641957 v1
node/13322641951 v1
node/13322641958 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174962332

Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
way/366237072 v6 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
node/3711350852 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174950134