OpenStreetMap
NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177393986 | about 3 hours ago | Hi OleKaysen, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 177368176 | about 14 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 12 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177360990 | about 17 hours ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cake shop on Beach Road Kollam" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 177356069 | about 17 hours ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty salon" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 177352320 | about 17 hours ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fachhändler für alkoholfreie Getränke"
#MapWithoutSpam |
| 177344285 | about 17 hours ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center for students" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 177356622 | about 17 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 15 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177354389 | about 17 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 25 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177348406 | about 17 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 21 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177345402 | about 17 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 129 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177335210 | about 17 hours ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 63 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177335013 | 1 day ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 38 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177333067 | 1 day ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 10 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 177321474 | 1 day ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 48 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|