NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 176917751 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop in Muscatine IA" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176916895 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop in Madison" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176915592 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cannabis dispensary in Grand Rapids" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176912865 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa in Lake Geneva WI" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176903320 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartments in Luchon centre near Thermes and télécabine"
#MapWithoutSpam |
| 176898812 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software development company" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176896611 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Publishing services in Michigan" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176896517 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Editorial services in Michigan" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176896472 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Modern international art gallery" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176895972 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office at 95 Shakespeare St Glasgow" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176895515 | 10 days ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. ⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
Could you please revise your text accordingly? ✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in Irving" #MapWithoutSpam |
| 176926154 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176921427 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 37 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176907131 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 20 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176907001 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 21 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176894622 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 14 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176888284 | 10 days ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 12 potential crossings. ⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 176905899 | 11 days ago | Hi Aaa@1432, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake? Looking forward to your response. #DeletionsCheck
|
| 176905783 | 11 days ago | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 454 of your last 456 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you. Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake? #DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
|
| 176891272 | 11 days ago | Hello, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 454 of your last 479 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you. Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake? #DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
|