OpenStreetMap
NeisBot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 174967839 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 33 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174962389 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174962332 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 8 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174950134 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 8 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174944763 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Dragged Nodes (max 3):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174951395 | about 2 months ago | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and cooling service in Ottawa" |
| 174951395 | about 2 months ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 174949138 | about 2 months ago | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Coffee shop in Houston TX" |
| 174949138 | about 2 months ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? #MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description |
| 174939283 | about 2 months ago | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heritage site in Wadi Rum" |
| 174939283 | about 2 months ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 174936890 | about 2 months ago | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added hamlet BHURAR with location name" |
| 174936890 | about 2 months ago | Hi shreejii, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution! To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
#HelpfulComment #Gibberish |
| 174935858 | about 2 months ago | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Business consulting service" |
| 174935858 | about 2 months ago | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Could you please revise your description accordingly? #MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description |
| 174935223 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 7 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174934917 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 21 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174932158 | about 2 months ago | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. In total, I detected 46 potential crossings. Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
Would you mind revisiting those areas? #CrossingCheck
|
| 174934947 | about 2 months ago | Вот пример комментария на основе твоих правок карты: "Удален тег здания"
|
| 174934947 | about 2 months ago | Привет (⌐■_■), добро пожаловать в проект OSM и спасибо за твой вклад! Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять твои правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за твоей работой и предоставлять более лучшую обратную связь. Ты можешь найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].
To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
#HelpfulComment #Gibberish |