Oops. I messed that up. Though I was removing it from the relation.

*added/updated CDP/admin_level 8 boundaries in california

My bad, i forgot to change the changeset comment.

If that's the name of the company, then I will indeed revert this change set.

You can see the revert here:
changeset/170949874

Hi, it seems that you might have messed up the Vegas valley relation (relation/18991913) it is currently is an unclosed relation

Your changeset just deletes the tags from a single admin way and leaves the relation open.

I've reverted it, and in the future, please don't modify admin boundaries if you don't know what you're doing.

If it's a major problem, then I suggest getting into contact with other mappers on the forum.

Ah, sorry about that. I'm used to deleting bad roads added by tiger that I thought that one was one of them. readded

Yeah, that was a typo. Fixed in changeset/165610084

According to the wiki, that's not the case. In fact, it says it shouldn't be tagged in a relation.
public_transport=platform

Hi, what was the source of the offical_name tag on the Village of Albany? (relation/199076). I tried finding it, but I couldn't.

Hi, that Wikimedia link you provided 404s

When I did this, I think I was worried about how it would render on the OSM main page, so I set it as inner and left it. If you're up to it, you can set it to outer or redo the geometry and fix it.

Changeset note is wrong. I replaced the geometry with newer 2024 tiger lines data.

Yeah, that would be the better tag for this.
This is my first time using lifecycle prefixes, I'm still trying to get a nomenclature right.
I fixed it in changset 158308733

source https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/GENZ2020/shp/cb_2020_50_place_500k.zip

I think you commented on the wrong changeset. All I did was remove ways that were overlapping. I didn't add these paths or the campsites.

There were two roads on top of each other with the same tags but different relations.
I moved the relations to one of the roads and deleted the extra.

Don't know what Relatify is, never used it.

Huh, I don't know why, but I though is_in was deprecated. And double-checking the wiki says is_in should use only if there aren't any admin boundaries, and by looking on the base OSM map, I don't see any admin boundaries. Re-added in changeset/154503305

Hi, just a heads-up, you didn't add a proper Wikidata item ID. It's supposed to start with Q with a bunch of trailing numbers, something like “Q12345" check the wiki for proper tagging examples. wikidata=*

No problem. No worries at all. We all make mistakes and learn as we go.

Reverted in changeset/153260063