Hi redd, thank you for sharing your comments on the changeset. Road segments shorter than a threshold value are flagged in the process, but it doesn’t mean that we should remove them all the time.
Here I have extended the short segment to capture the driveway within the parking area. My proposal would be simply to glue the driveway and the parking area, instead of performing a revert.

Please let me know if you agree with this and want me to update the map accordingly.

Hi norgis,

Instead of deleting an object, I should have updated its classification and tag as a path instead. The bridge is clearly visible. Changeset reverted and the roads are classified as paths. Please let me know it is OK with you too.

Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections on lane numbers. I will be more careful on lanes and lane-specific tagging in my future edits.
Regarding the oneway tag, it is not wrong, but redundant as documented in the OSM Wiki (junction=roundabout#The_roundabout_itself), the direction of the traffic flow taken as the direction of the way.

Hi Udarian,
Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: access=employees?uselang=en
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/36520/access-for-employees-only/
Please let me know if this approach was in conflict with the customs of the local community and share any documentation, if available. I will be happy to discuss how to move forward and improve the data.

Hi Udarian,
Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: access=employees?uselang=en
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/36520/access-for-employees-only/
Please let me know if this approach was in conflict with the customs of the local community and share any documentation, if available. I will be happy to discuss how to move forward and improve the data.

Hi MxxCon, thank you for your concern on this matter. I’ve removed the building polygons by referring to the latest Esri World Imagery (visible on zoom level 18 or less) and the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) data, both indicating the building was demolished. Kindly let me know if you have any further questions.

Hello Wulfmorn, Thank you for your contribution. Make sure to edit the data in a complex way - I restored a relation way/1245921693 after you removed duplicated highway. Happy Mapping!

Hello Laura Mugeha
Thank You for your contribution.
Make sure to use imagery sources mentioned in a project - while quality checking I found incorrectly created buildings, for example ways: 1361251713, 1362928697, 1361742066, 1362044332. Happy Mapping!

Hi Frans S, I will keep in mind the effect of shadows around taller buildings in my future edits. Thank you for your valuable feedback and your corrections.

Hi Frans S,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi, thanks for the feedback. I accidentally added the wrong tags to this polygon. I've corrected the data now.

I agree. Thank you for sharing your input and adding the tree row.

Regards,
Nar_ach

Hi SekeRob,

To fix a self-intersection error, I adjusted the node/4469832665 which overlapped with the farmland polygon. I referred to the source PCN 2012 - Italy, which showed trees covering the polygon until node/10304054334. For this reason I didn't modify the alignment of the existing polygon. Thank you for improving the data!

Regards,
Nar_ach

Hi janolezab, I will be more careful while uploading the changesets.

Thank you for your input and valuable remark.

Hi majkaz, I changed the classification to service as per your suggestion.