Hello Kautilya3,
Thank you for adding Chinese pinyin to the current or new Rechin La but you added wrongly. The pinyin of the Chinese name, 热藏山口, is Rèzàng Shānkǒu rather than Rècáng Shānkǒu. Please note that sometimes a Chinese character could have two or more pronounces and don't just follow the pinyin that translators give. Please fix it. Thanks!

Kautilya3，您好：
感谢您细心观察，但我经过在中国•国家地名信息库中再次比对，至少在中国•国家地名信息库中，这里确实被标注为“马鞍山”（Ma'an Hill）。中国•国家地名信息库是目前中国最完整的地名数据库，是中国各地政府参与的官方的公开数据库（且引用内容不会存在版权争议），其内容权威性高，所以我在此标注。但您说得也很有道理，北面的Trig H.确实更加符合这个地名的描述，我将会在其它地方在此寻找来源来查证此处名称，不过我建议在没有来源前暂时不要更改此处，谢谢。

请问阁下为什么删除实际存在之物？

已经55天过去😅

@NMYR Got it. According to recent proofs (after 20210920), India is actually controling west part of Naki Nana.
The line 895904282 should be the right line. I will change it soon or you could change it first if you're if you can't wait.

(The line 895904282 way/895904282#map=18/35.17361/78.07787&layers=D )

OK. Thanks!

Hello,
You seemed to delete the wiki data, but I think it's right. Could you please tell me about it?

Hello,
You seemed to delete the wiki data, but I think it's right. Could you please tell me about it?

I think 快乐的老鼠宝宝 done in changeset/111485466 is fix to your damage because addition in fixme and deletion in name:en truly make damage to data, this should not be done as a maintainer.

Besides, how long will your investigation finished?

If your "investigation" never ends, does that mean freezing this area forever?

PLEASE RESPONSE TO THOSE QUESTION BEFORE LAST TIME YOU DO，DEAR DWG MEMBER，EDVAC SIR！

How DWG solve this?

Just by giving a sentence again and again:"
This area, together with the Doklam plateau, are under investigation by the DWG."

So the result???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

So what's the results of it? Or how much have the investigation taken?

这些名字来自于一些微博的军事博主，并且也依照附近地名来命名；但是由于内容发布时间较早，具体的那条微博我现在找不到了，请谅解。

问阁下，既然在该区域在接受调查，那么您为什么要先做出更改？
Why did you make the change first when this area is under investigation?

尊敬的孟阁下，您好：

您在变更集#109657388中变更了金门边界，并且没有给出相应的依据或变更理由，亦造成了关系上的错误，在下回退了阁下的变更集，并在变更集内解释了原因，阁下现继续做出此编辑，且在变更集注释中没有给出有效的信息，希望可以给出做出此变更的原因或根据，谢谢，祝编安。

NM$L，重庆

==Copy from 94546363==
devac您好，
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了，我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况，其余我无可奉告。
并且，数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界，不加以警告或提醒，干啥啥不行，双标第一名，我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪，请见谅，我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

怎么到处都有嘉心糖（喜

😅

devac您好，
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了，我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况，其余我无可奉告。
并且，数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界，不加以警告或提醒，干啥啥不行，双标第一名，我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪，请见谅，我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation.
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded.
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L

来源
https://dmfw.mca.gov.cn/online/map.html?keyWordPlaceName=&isIndex=true