So I will restore it, and by the way, please check the satellite image before you delete, thx.

Hello, in this changeset, you deleted the building of Chongqingxi(W.) railway station, and also I noticed you have deleted other buildings in other changesets. Could you please tell me why did you do so? Thanks.

😅

Sorry, there is a relation of Aksai Chin, so I mean we should add "- West Part". Thx. (〃°ω°〃)

Thanks for your reply and fixing. So this is the boundary relation of the west section, and I think if it only includes the west part, we should add "- West Part" or "to Aksai Chin" to its name after "Chinese claim". How about you? If you don't mind, I will do it myself. Thank you.

And also, I think the eastern section (South Tibet) should be included in the relation.

The Chinese claim line in Pangong Lake area is line823046242, according to the standard map of Chinese government.

Hello,
You added a village called Lower Doklam village. Could you tell me what's the source of its name?

隔壁老王头，您好：

首先感谢您改进地图。但您在变更集114499432、114500078、114500249、114501240、114502264、114502553、114505626、114506422中的更改严重破坏了班公湖片区的关系，我已将其回退，但保留了其中有意义的其他变更。

有时一个多边形过大时，我们会将其拆分为多个线段以方便编辑以及方便构成其它同时使用这些线段作为边界的关系（您可以将这一条线同时添加为两个关系的外部成员，这样就可以不用重复地绘制线段），并添加到一个表示多边形的关系中（关系中会有type=multipolygon这个键），班公湖也是如此。您也许想要将班公湖多边形关系西部的外部成员合并成为一条线，且将东西两部分分开，使用单独的一个要素表示这个巨大的湖，这导致了大量其他相关多边形关系边界出现缺口，关系不完整，地图也无法渲染，请您不要这样做（尤其是您使用iD而不是JOSM编辑时，iD无法编辑显示区域外的要素，大型关系使用iD编辑极其容易出现错误），也请您后续编辑时稍加注意，提交更改前稍加检查，谢谢！

还有114500249。

回退的变更集有114499432、114500078、114500078、114501240、114502264、114502553、114505626、114506422。以上变更集，由于用户 @隔壁老王头 将班公湖多边形关系（multipolygon relation）西部的外部（outer）成员合并成为了一条直线，切将东西两部分分开，导致了大量其他相关多边形关系边界出现缺口，故回退。

114514

😅😅😅😅😅还没有进展啊😅😅😅😅😅

Thanks for adding tag. But it may be wrong that tag Lulin Region( relation/3964620 ) controlled by China. Actually this area is controlled by both China and Bhutan, and Bhutan controls more area of it, such as Charit. Although I'm a Chinese user, I would respect that fact. So in my opinion, it may be better to tag its controlled_by tag as BT. Could you help to correct the tag? Thank you.

Yes. Now it's sure there are 4 xiaokang villages in Lagyap, 3 of which are in disputed area. And it is the last one Chinese xiaokang village in Lagyap called Basanglong(巴桑隆).

According to de facto, Pangda Village is under the control of China. So its is_in:country tag should be filled with China although you see the village is in the Bhutan side on OSM which is because the DWG is stopping users from changing the boundary when the fact changes.

此变更集为政治编辑，已被回退。

Oh thanks.
The western(left) one is 热钦沟(Reqin Gou) while the eastern(right) one 热琼沟(Reqiong Gou). It was my mistake. I will correct it soon or you could do it first. Thanks again!
See the first pic of https://m.weibo.cn/1142487595/4544101506103733

Chinese city form is usually different from that of other country. So in OSM, we always map cities, towns and villages according to their administrative level and place the nodes at the government building site. Check the OSM wiki to learn more.

Both Shiquanhe Town and Gar County set the government there. So Gar is not Shiquanhe. ( #ReH )