MountSneffels's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172924413 | Hello soliMM! SableIsland is no longer on the team, so I will be handing this on their behalf, Thank you for reaching out and mentioning that (node/11422567116) and (node/11422567115) already act as pedestrian crossings. Happy mapping! |
|
| 177016697 | In the illustrative examples on the Wiki under “Selection of the right highway tag”, there are cases where the highest-classified roads connecting to a roundabout are _link roads, yet the roundabout itself is tagged with the highest non-link classification entering it. My interpretation of these examples is that a roundabout should be classified according to the highest non-link road that enters it. At the time of my edit, way/45557151, way/23727007, way/1282746910, and way/723084290 were tagged as trunk_link, and the roundabout itself was tagged as tertiary, with no tertiary road directly connecting to it. After my edit, BerryTrails retagged those trunk_link ways as tertiary. In retrospect, I realize that the correct approach would have been for me to reclassify the connecting roads rather than changing the roundabout to residential.
|
|
| 177016697 | Hello rarad74, I made this residential since, according to policy(junction=roundabout), the highest classified roads that are not links that intersect this roundabout are residential. The user BerryTrails has since reclassified the trunk and tertiary links to tertiary in this changeset(changeset/177031565). Based on this update, I agree that tertiary now makes sense for the roundabout classification, but am open to further thoughts on this. Thank you, and have a nice day. |
|
| 176079002 | Hello Dimitar155, Thank you for the reminder. I have gone ahead and updated the surrounding features, and will keep this in mind for future updates like this one. Happy mapping! |