Hi Layft Greater,
Thank you for reaching out, I used Vantor Hub imagery from March 2026 to make this edit and meant to cite that imagery.

Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source.

If you have any updates or newer imagery, I can defer to your edits.

Hello Branko Kokanovic,

The name “Ибарски пут” was originally added by the user Badojo in 2020 on connecting ways (way/303639291 and way/839882710). I transferred the name to the spit portions of the road entering the roundabout as it is a logical extension of the same road which shares the same ref. In a previous changeset discussion (changeset/165018916), you indicated that transferring name tags across short connecting segments was acceptable, which is why I made this edit. If you’d prefer that we no longer make these kinds of transfers, please let us know.

Hi rhhs,
I added access=no to this gate because it appears to be consistently closed in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6165627272&lng=23.364391304207&z=17.975366355939702&pKey=699843529508177&focus=photo) and it looks latched without any visible automatic opening mechanism. Based on the imagery, it seems more like an extension of the fence rather than a regularly used access point, likely intended only for maintenance or utility services. The lift gates to the east (node/6319080762) appear to function as the primary controlled entry and exit for the neighborhood, as also supported by Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6167441463177&lng=23.365439921119105&z=17.975366355939702&pKey=697504713051265&focus=map&x=0.5065623090892195&y=0.5108036261094887&zoom=0). That said, if you have local knowledge or information suggesting otherwise, I’m more than happy to defer to your judgment.
Thanks!

Hi jptolosa,
Thank you for catching that, I do see evidence to support oneway=no and changed that back.
Have a nice day!