Hi Krittt

Please kindly be more careful when mapping from satellite. The road below doesn't exist on the ground and the tagging scheme is incorrect.

จะให้ผมอธิบายเป็นภาษาไทยไหมครับ?

you're correct

Following way going through walls:
622940527
622940524
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62297703

Way 628709404 surrounds an office building in an urban environment, how can it be residential?

Hi, you had linked the service road of FYI to pai singh to, it doesn't link to the back so I added a service way and linked to that instead. Thank you.

Road going through buildings, service road on possibly what is a house without adding barriers, service roads attached via node, not sure if this is where the entrance actually is. #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65033365

For reference #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65037345

This changeset is too scattered. It's difficult to go through it and comment, I'm moving on.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65037345

Neutral, but you shouldn't override a local mapper's service with satellite residence #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65360799

Why would you change this from secondary_link to primary? #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65360665

Aligned to what? That's not accurate because it's a construction site and aerial imagery is invalid #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65124082

Do you have any evidence that this service road links up to the unclassified road above? #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65190954

Residential road linking secondary highway #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65360782

Several problems with this, #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

Please remove this and the connecting service road that you've added. This area is now a construction site. Secondary, it's irresponsible to add a service road without identifying what kind of access is allowed through it. Would you appreciate it if your GPS tried to route you through a restricted or private area?
FYI I'm referring to
way/623281660
way/623281690
way/623281658
way/623281656

FYI I'm referring to

way/623281660
way/623281690
way/623281658
way/623281656

Several problems with this, #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

Please remove this and the connecting service road that you've added. This area is now a construction site. Secondary, it's irresponsible to add a service road without identifying what kind of access is allowed through it. Would you appreciate it if your GPS tried to route you through a restricted or private area?

> Here we need help from local mappers to guide us and correct us as appropriate

This is the crux of the problem. I don't think it works this way, try to get someone from your team to map your city using your standard and see how easy it is to correct after the fact. Your workflow may be appropriate for a closed GIS system, but doesn't really work in OSM context.

Just with random sampling:
628703875
628507844
410269871 is sloppy, look at the trailing node.
183877605 <-- this isn't quite how we do connections
628709422

I'm reverting this changeset Sridhar.

You connected roads that are not physically connected and added back roads that have been removed because the area has been demolished!

#WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

ภาพดาวเทียมไม่ตรงเสมอไปนะครับ แนะนำให้เปิด layer GPS ด้วย
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60481023