OpenStreetMap
Mingwei's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175864200 | Hey - please don't map bike lanes separately unless they're actually a bike path separate from the road |
|
| 165530347 | Please do not map bike lanes as separate ways unless they are separated from the roadway (i.e. class 4, protected) |
|
| 169435215 | Nice |
|
| 142840402 | Looks good! |
|
| 133599949 | nice |
|
| 153507873 | nice thank you |
|
| 151294394 | Nice! |
|
| 151209841 | 🎉 |
|
| 151429676 | Thanks SomeoneElse! |
|
| 151388676 | Seems good |
|
| 145306791 | Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: osm.wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes` |
|
| 145781131 | nice |
|
| 143933300 | Nice! |
|
| 143333684 | Nice |
|
| 139806457 | These bikeways should be marked as cycleway=track since they are physically separated from the general travel lanes. Considered Class IV bikeways. Fixed in changeset/140036210 |
|
| 138475752 | definitely should be sidewalk=separate |
|
| 137939793 | Thank you! |
|
| 137625273 | missed a spot way/8922462 |
|
| 136918820 | Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong |
|
| 136986542 | Please stop randomly changing road classes, and please give your edits meaningful descriptions
|
