OpenStreetMap
Mingwei's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165530347 | 4 months ago | Please do not map bike lanes as separate ways unless they are separated from the roadway (i.e. class 4, protected) |
| 169435215 | 4 months ago | Nice |
| 142840402 | 12 months ago | Looks good! |
| 133599949 | about 1 year ago | nice |
| 153507873 | over 1 year ago | nice thank you |
| 151294394 | over 1 year ago | Nice! |
| 151209841 | over 1 year ago | 🎉 |
| 151429676 | over 1 year ago | Thanks SomeoneElse! |
| 151388676 | over 1 year ago | Seems good |
| 145306791 | over 1 year ago | Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: osm.wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes` |
| 145781131 | almost 2 years ago | nice |
| 143933300 | about 2 years ago | Nice! |
| 143333684 | about 2 years ago | Nice |
| 139806457 | over 2 years ago | These bikeways should be marked as cycleway=track since they are physically separated from the general travel lanes. Considered Class IV bikeways. Fixed in changeset/140036210 |
| 138475752 | over 2 years ago | definitely should be sidewalk=separate |
| 137939793 | over 2 years ago | Thank you! |
| 137625273 | over 2 years ago | missed a spot way/8922462 |
| 136918820 | over 2 years ago | Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong |
| 136986542 | over 2 years ago | Please stop randomly changing road classes, and please give your edits meaningful descriptions
|
| 127026864 | over 2 years ago | Heads up the mixing zone turn lanes, e.g. at Oak onto Scott, are cycleway:right=shared_lane, with sharrows cycleway:right:lane=pictogram |
