These road classifications are not correct

These road classifications are not correct

These road classifications are not correct

Why was the bridge and road surface information removed?

Not a primary road according to OSM conventions highway=primary

Why was the bridge deleted?

Welcome to OSM! Very nice work on this area.

Reverted nonstandard edit in changeset/186698957

Hi, why was this changed to Primary?

Hi, you marked a boundary as tertiary highway. I have corrected it.

Welcome to OSM :-)

Why are multiple cameras being created at the same location?

Hi, the Jenkins Street railroad crossing has been fully opened

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Why was the driveway near the McDaniel / Cleveland intersection removed? Also why were the crossing points removed from the McDaniel / Cleveland intersection? Tip: Press Q to square the corners on buildings.

Unless a community has a very strong ground surveying force, it is impractical to assert that all OSM changes require a current on-site ground survey. I am amused at revisiting a site from 10 years ago and finding that a business closed a month after the survey, thus being falsely marked as an open business in OSM for nearly 10 years. Also, this discussion could be a candidate for the OSM Community web site.

The primary purpose of OSM is to create geo data for consumers to use, not to display a map, although many consumes use it to display a map. If they consider driveways to be a clutter, they will not display them. Many other types objects are being added that could equally be questioned such as turning circles, nonexistent floor levels, and road signs. Why include the entire length of terminating roads even before there are any houses? Much of today's OSM data seems like extra overhead, but I've been surprised in the past when something that seems to be useless suddenly has value.
Adding buildings to busy areas has always required conflict resolution to make the new building coexist with existing land cover, land use, water features, sidewalks, and other buildings.

Welcome to OSM! Note that there is already a node for Pella Windows and Doors in the correct position. Imports should check for existing objects and add or correct information when necessary.

Thanks for the restore. Usually I'd be cautious about the private access tag, but in the context of the trails apps, it would make sense to add private to these walkways since they could suggest a network connected by grass for routers.

Hi, Why were the footpaths removed? They appear to follow the walkway to the house.

What was the date of the telemetry and imagery used for this change? This was only changed over on May 16-18 and any data before that would be completely different.