Nope, not at all, it’s completely different. There’s a soccer field now, chess tables and a small gazebo; the whole place was demolished and mad anew. I can’t really accurately map them since the street imagery hasn’t been updated to reflect the new equipment.

Hmmm, I see. No it’s just paint. Lane will be deleted.

The tot lot became parkland within the past decade or so and is listed as such in the NYC parks website. While yes, it is a playground, I’d say it’s an un-outlined area within the tot lot albeit a huge portion of it. I’ll document the playground area now.

Oh, the church. Yes, you’re right. It’s concrete with parking aisles around it. That was my mistake. Also, yes that’s a garden. I’d argue the garden could also qualify as grassy terrain buuut that would just end up being semantics. I’ll edit the footprint.

It has title included on the signs posted on the fence on the entrances. I was on the fence myself about that name. It looks so messy. Although, “Community Playground” is a bigger font than the rest of the name on the sign. It can pass for both. I’ll just name it community playground. The large name irks me too.

I thought I added the community farm to the rest of the red hook park. Unless I confused something.

That area is highlighted as part of Grady Playground in the NYCGovMap and oddly enough has the official NYC park sign located on the football field’s fencing for what it’s worth.

The source link from NYC Parks highlights that area as part of the park in it’s maps and speaks about it in it’s history, too.

I meant to put recreational grounds on the area containing both pitches. That one was my mistake.

Hmm… you’re right. I should’ve added fencing.

I would say it did if it was exclusively for school used but it’s also designated for public use after school hours via the signs by the entrances.

The rear was hard for me to tell but the link you provided showed it was different than I had it initially. So, I tried to replicate it but I’m unsure which works fine since it has a bunch of balconies and grassy area around it’s base.

While I know parking lots aren’t named this parking lot had a sign with the aforementioned name in front. Whether or not this deserves to be documented is up to you.

Dorman Square’s sign is on the street post by the Chase next to Ave M’s sign. Greenstreets’ sign is on the patch itself facing the subway.

Sounds like you need to step foot outside and see the city issued signs for yourself then.

Literally step foot in the area. There are signs designating them. In fact, you can probably find said signs for both aforementioned areas on Google maps.

After further evaluation, you’re correct. I cannot back up that it’s an official landmark. What would you suggest such a historic piece of architecture be classified as?

You are correct! Deleted the roads. However the building still needs to be filled in.