Hi!

The street name was assigned incorrectly, because according to VARIS (Valsts adrešu reģistra informācijas sistēma) data, this is not 18. Novembra iela. This road segment does not have any official name at all. It also has no name according to LĢIA data.

18. Novembra iela runs perpendicular to this street. A living street cannot be given a name that does not apply to it just because such streets are expected to have a name. I mapped the living street only up to the relevant road sign. The continuation beyond that point as an unclassified road seems logical to me.

Hi! Restored to highway=residential. Officially it's called Samteņu iela, even though it's gated. A path is usually a narrow way intended for pedestrians and not suitable for two-track vehicles. In this case, it's enough to specify access=private. Changeset: 165603817

Hi! Removed the non-existent road segment. Changeset: 165603452

Surveyed the area on-site. In changeset/164366840, corrected data, drew a fence around the property, added gate, and marked access=private. That should be sufficient.

Hi!
It's unclear why you marked this entire area as building=residential. Looking at the orthophoto and Google Street View, it appears to be land rather than a building. Perhaps you meant to use landuse=residential? If so, you should first adjust the landuse=industrial polygon before applying the new landuse=residential polygon. These polygons should not overlap.
Additionally, the layer=1 tag is unnecessary here.

Hi!
Way: 107112103 needs the highway=service tag restored.

Sveiks!
Pamanīju tavos changeset’os nelielu kļūdu. Lauku teritorijās tu atsevišķas viensētas mēdz apzīmēt kā landuse=residential (piemēram, way/1372508681). Pareizāk būtu tās apzīmēt ar place=isolated_dwelling vai landuse=farmyard, ja redzams, ka saimniecībā ir izteikta lauksaimniecības infrastruktūra (stallis, kūts, graudu kaltes u.tml.).
landuse=residential būtu piemērotāk lietot vietās, kur blakus viena otrai atrodas vairākas apdzīvotas ēkas un tās var apvienot vienā poligonā.

Veiksmi turpmākajā kartēšanā!

Hi!
Why did you move the location of the place named "Rožupes" to a different spot in the forest?
Node: 9887244183

Paldies par komentāru. :)

All good. Best of luck with your future mapping! ;)

Hello!
I’d like to discuss a few questions with you.

Way: 973781455 Why did you change the surface of this track section to sand when it’s not pure sand but rather a mix of gravel and stones? This is evident when compared to the eastern part of the same track, Way: 1310603537, where it becomes difficult to travel by bike or on foot.

Way: 699903660 and Way: 178451404 Why did you change these highways to tracks? They are important local roads that people actively use to get from the city to the allotments on the Daugavpils bypass. They are certainly not just tracks.

Čau!
Ņemšu vērā, un, kā vienmēr, paldies par taviem noderīgajiem padomiem.

Thank you for the explanation.
From now on, for man_made=cutline ways, if I see that they are used for transportation purposes, I will also apply highway=track.

Hmm... well, cutlines are essentially drivable if you have a good off-road vehicle, like a Lada Niva. And sometimes they are also used as tracks, but in forestry, these strips are created to separate forest blocks. However, cutline=firebreak is plowed every year to limit the spread of fire through the undergrowth, and they are not intended for movement. I think it's correct to show them as cutline=firebreak even if they are sometimes used as tracks.

It's possible that cutline=border could be indicated together with highway=track (if feasible) in cases where they are also used for transport.

Hi!
I surveyed the situation in nature and made some changes to the geometry and attributes: changeset/153941266

The water level of the lake depends on the time when the orthophoto was taken. Additionally, reedbeds are very common in marshes, and in this case, I wanted to show it as a marshy lake shore, where it marsh gradually transitions into the lake with reeds. There isn't enough time to do everything at once :)

Labi, sapratu. Paldies par komentāru.

Understood now. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am a relatively new OSM mapper and there are things I still don't fully understand. :)

As far as I understand, natural=wetland can only be a polygon and cannot be a way.

The boundary of the Swamp polygon (way) is simultaneously its outer boundary and the inner boundary of the wood polygon. A multipolygon is necessary here to avoid overlapping of the two polygons and to reduce the number of geometries.