McNs's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162367176 | 12 months ago | Editing error - thanks for the catch - have reverted the highway tag |
| 116687091 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for the additional info @kylenz - that looks to be a more logical approach and would allow any mapping services that use OSM to still recognise these streets as walkable (it wasn't just Strava with this issue - two other websites I use to track wlaking/running activities did not recognise these as streets that were walkable). I agree foot=no should only be for streets/raods where pedestrians should not walk. @KingCZE will you look to restore these as foot=yes or foot=use_sidepath? I have an interest in tidying this up so don't mind working through the edits. |
| 116687091 | over 3 years ago | It looks as though this change (foot=no when there is a mapped sidewalk) causes issues with websites that use OSM for foot navigation (such as Strava when creating a route). Should foot=no only be used for genuine non walkable streets? |
| 116892654 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for the feedback. Am I better simply removing the bicycle tag in the Tags box? I had been using the dropdown options. Most paths in the area have no bicycle tags which is what I was trying to replicate |