My error - you are correct.

I have updated

Thanks

These are not yet open to the public and therefore should not be marked as useable by pedestrians and cyclists.

I am going to edit these as "no" until they are open.

I think the important thing is that a missing path has been added, one that is widely used.

HI

I see not reason why bikes couldn't use it and I've seen people on bikes over there in the past. Not seen any horses.

Cheers

Matt

Hey

That was inadvertent!

I did think I checked it, but obviously not!

Cheers

Matt

Actually my understand of what OSM says is a shared path that isn't separated from the road, as in this situation, shouldn't be marked as a separate path. It does make the mapping look very messy.

Would you add a path alongside every road that has a pedestrian pavement?

How is this any different?

Hello mate. Yes, you are right. I did think I had updated that but obviously didn't save it. I have now updated it. Cheers, Matt