Matija Nalis's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 176931859 | 33 minutes ago | Hvala na potvrdi i ispravku! |
| 176931859 | 1 day ago | Pozdrav! Vidim da si prije par dana označio nekoliko željezničko-cestovnih prijelaza u Požegi kao crossing:barrier=double_half -- sjećaš li se koji je bio izvor za odabir vrste rampe? Taj tag se naime koristi za označavanja kada postoje 4 polubranika (dva sa svake strane ceste), što mislim da nemamo situaciju u Hrvatskoj? Obično imamo ili pune branike (jedna brklja sa svaka strane blokira *oba* smjera ceste) ili češće polubranike (koji blokiraju samo traku u jednom smjeru). Znaš li možda koji od njih trebaju biti? Hvala i pozdrav! |
| 166421911 | 10 days ago | It seems to be regular crossing:barrier=half according to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=220898780992339 so I'll change it in that way. Let me know if you think it was crossing:barrier=double_half instead (i.e. 4 half-length boom barriers at railway crossing instead of just 2 half-length barriers) |
| 166422794 | 10 days ago | is seems to be regular crossing:barrier=half according to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=856333242712385 so I'll change it in that way. Let me know if you think it was crossing:barrier=double_half instead (i.e. 4 half-length boom barriers at railway crossing instead of just 2 half-length barriers) |
| 172966339 | 10 days ago | u svakom slučaju, po zadnjim street-level slikama na https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3818902188354756 (kao i komentarima na telegram grupi sa local_knowledge) izgleda da je to obični crossing:barrier=half a NE crossing:barrier=double_half, pa sam tako i izmijenio. |
| 175604662 | 11 days ago | Hi Angela, thanks for the answer! I'm however not finding that area covered at Mapillary (nor Panoramax), so you're probably found it somewhere else. But I don't think there exist any crossing:barrier=double_half in Croatia (railway technical documentation here does not even seem to mention it as an option for ŽCP). So I would guess it was probably regular crossing:barrier=half (i.e. only one half-length lifting pole on each side of the railway, instead of 4 of them altogether). So no worries, I'll update that node; I just wanted to doublecheck with you first. See crossing:barrier=*#Examples for example pictures how each tagging looks in practice. Cheers,
|
| 152113970 | 15 days ago | Hi, about year and a half ago you've marked this railway crossing node/341808867 as `double_half`.
|
| 172966339 | 15 days ago | Hi, about 3 months ago you've marked this railway crossing node/484963970 as `double_half`.
|
| 147502500 | 15 days ago | Hi, about 2 years ago you've marked this railway crossing node/631861287 as `double_half`.
|
| 175604662 | 15 days ago | Hi, few weeks ago you've marked this railway crossing node/1064868217 as `double_half`.
|
| 166421911 | 15 days ago | Hi, some 8 months ago you've marked this crossing node/668446757 as `double_half`. Do you
|
| 166422794 | 15 days ago | Hi, some 8 months ago you've marked this crossing node/668446694 as `double_half`. Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks! |
| 134428674 | 24 days ago | Pozdrav, vidim da si označio ovaj put blizu Stobreča way/1159243693/history/1 kao "private" za motorna vozila (što je ok), ali "permissive" za ostalo (dakle bicikli, pješice, i sl.) Permissive znači da je svima dozvoljeno tamo prolaziti (dok vlasnik ne povuče dozvolu). Sjećaš li se da li je to tako zaista, jer drugim korisnicima se čini da je privatno za sve (uključujući i pješake i bicikliste)? pogledaj note/4959832 |
| 173168186 | 27 days ago | This conflicts with the information in Croatian Cadastral Geoportal, which seems to be more complete. Please join discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/granica-hr-bih-bivsa-vojna-baza-aerodrom-zeljava/139411 to resolve this dispute. |
| 175090096 | about 1 month ago | Thakns! no, that was my mistake, I've missed the other parking while fixing note/4345796 I've tried to clean it up now (using LiDAR 2022+2023 Croatia imagery, as it is higher precision than regular 2023+2024)... most of the uncovered area does not look like a parking lot but something else (there is only few marked parking spaces on the southern part).
|
| 169819687 | 2 months ago | Hm, za Gemini (node/338798325) vidim da si provjerio 1.8.2025 i dodao telefon (i strgani facebook link)... To si zvao/vidio osobno da radi ili? Jer ja nisam vidio da radi, a sudski registar kaže da su u stečaju: https://sudreg.pravosudje.hr/ords/r/esudreg/public/podaci-o-poslovnom-subjektu?p28_sbt_mbs=081326892 |
| 157839397 | 5 months ago | Hm, Amazinga (https://amazinga.fun/atrakcije/) i slični su prije leisure=indoor_play što je bilo originalno nego leisure=sports_centre ("Facilities within a sports centre may include swimming pools, spa, solarium, sauna and/or steam room, sports hall, squash courts, fitness suite, aerobics studios, outdoor grass and/or artificial pitches for football (soccer), hockey etc") na što si bio promijenio? |
| 157509544 | 5 months ago | Hi @mueschel I've noticed you've changed `image:menu` to `menu:url` in node/12211682359/history/3 Is there a reason? Neither seems documented on the wiki and both seem to have similar (few dozen) usages. But changing it breaks https://mapcomplete.org/food.html in this case, so there is that disadvantage. Did you perhaps mean more popular (and documented) website:menu ? Also see https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2498 |
| 165088739 | 8 months ago | navodno puštena u pogon; maknuo sam access=no i barrier=block isto, i spojio biciklističke (ima li i dalje na spoju za bicikle?) - https://kaportal.net.hr/aktualno/vijesti/karlovac/1358872/u-promet-pustena-nova-cesta-ilovac-orlovac-izgradile-je-hrvatske-zeljeznice-to-je-dio-projekta-izgradnje-drugog-kolosijeka-pruge/ #surveyme |
| 166014603 | 8 months ago | Website works just fine, see e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20250509121736/https://www.parasailing.com.hr/. User has contacted local OSM group, so we're helping him to re-add it will full tags. I'll revert this changeset. |