It seems to be regular crossing:barrier=half according to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=220898780992339 so I'll change it in that way. Let me know if you think it was crossing:barrier=double_half instead (i.e. 4 half-length boom barriers at railway crossing instead of just 2 half-length barriers)

is seems to be regular crossing:barrier=half according to https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=856333242712385 so I'll change it in that way. Let me know if you think it was crossing:barrier=double_half instead (i.e. 4 half-length boom barriers at railway crossing instead of just 2 half-length barriers)

u svakom slučaju, po zadnjim street-level slikama na https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3818902188354756 (kao i komentarima na telegram grupi sa local_knowledge) izgleda da je to obični crossing:barrier=half a NE crossing:barrier=double_half, pa sam tako i izmijenio.

Hi Angela, thanks for the answer! I'm however not finding that area covered at Mapillary (nor Panoramax), so you're probably found it somewhere else.

But I don't think there exist any crossing:barrier=double_half in Croatia (railway technical documentation here does not even seem to mention it as an option for ŽCP). So I would guess it was probably regular crossing:barrier=half (i.e. only one half-length lifting pole on each side of the railway, instead of 4 of them altogether).

So no worries, I'll update that node; I just wanted to doublecheck with you first.

See crossing:barrier=*#Examples for example pictures how each tagging looks in practice.

Cheers,
Matija

Hi, about year and a half ago you've marked this railway crossing node/341808867 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!

Hi, about 3 months ago you've marked this railway crossing node/484963970 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!

Hi, about 2 years ago you've marked this railway crossing node/631861287 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!

Hi, few weeks ago you've marked this railway crossing node/1064868217 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular `crossing:barrier=half` ? Thanks!

Hi, some 8 months ago you've marked this crossing node/668446757 as `double_half`. Do you
recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!

Hi, some 8 months ago you've marked this crossing node/668446694 as `double_half`. Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!

Pozdrav,

vidim da si označio ovaj put blizu Stobreča way/1159243693/history/1 kao "private" za motorna vozila (što je ok), ali "permissive" za ostalo (dakle bicikli, pješice, i sl.)

Permissive znači da je svima dozvoljeno tamo prolaziti (dok vlasnik ne povuče dozvolu).

Sjećaš li se da li je to tako zaista, jer drugim korisnicima se čini da je privatno za sve (uključujući i pješake i bicikliste)?

pogledaj note/4959832

This conflicts with the information in Croatian Cadastral Geoportal, which seems to be more complete.

Please join discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/granica-hr-bih-bivsa-vojna-baza-aerodrom-zeljava/139411 to resolve this dispute.

Thakns! no, that was my mistake, I've missed the other parking while fixing note/4345796

I've tried to clean it up now (using LiDAR 2022+2023 Croatia imagery, as it is higher precision than regular 2023+2024)... most of the uncovered area does not look like a parking lot but something else (there is only few marked parking spaces on the southern part).
Anyway, if you have better local knowledge, feel free to further improve!

Hm, za Gemini (node/338798325) vidim da si provjerio 1.8.2025 i dodao telefon (i strgani facebook link)...

To si zvao/vidio osobno da radi ili? Jer ja nisam vidio da radi, a sudski registar kaže da su u stečaju: https://sudreg.pravosudje.hr/ords/r/esudreg/public/podaci-o-poslovnom-subjektu?p28_sbt_mbs=081326892

Hm, Amazinga (https://amazinga.fun/atrakcije/) i slični su prije leisure=indoor_play što je bilo originalno nego leisure=sports_centre ("Facilities within a sports centre may include swimming pools, spa, solarium, sauna and/or steam room, sports hall, squash courts, fitness suite, aerobics studios, outdoor grass and/or artificial pitches for football (soccer), hockey etc") na što si bio promijenio?

Hi @mueschel

I've noticed you've changed `image:menu` to `menu:url` in node/12211682359/history/3

Is there a reason? Neither seems documented on the wiki and both seem to have similar (few dozen) usages.

But changing it breaks https://mapcomplete.org/food.html in this case, so there is that disadvantage.

Did you perhaps mean more popular (and documented) website:menu ?

Also see https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2498

navodno puštena u pogon; maknuo sam access=no i barrier=block isto, i spojio biciklističke (ima li i dalje na spoju za bicikle?) - https://kaportal.net.hr/aktualno/vijesti/karlovac/1358872/u-promet-pustena-nova-cesta-ilovac-orlovac-izgradile-je-hrvatske-zeljeznice-to-je-dio-projekta-izgradnje-drugog-kolosijeka-pruge/ #surveyme

Website works just fine, see e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20250509121736/https://www.parasailing.com.hr/. User has contacted local OSM group, so we're helping him to re-add it will full tags. I'll revert this changeset.

Given the node on which name tag was removed, referenced wiki is likely place=ocean - but I haven't really seen a discussion on the issue either

Pozdrav, i hvala na sudjelovanju u OSM mapathonu!

Ispravio sam ovdje uličnu lampu sa tagom highway=street_lamp

Također, "name" tag koristimo samo za prava imena (npr. naziv kafića, trgovine, muzeja...) a ne za opise.

Ukoliko imaš bilo kakvih dodatnih pitanja ili nejasnoća, slobodno pitaj ovdje ili na nekom od komunikacijskih kanala: https://osm-hr.org/openstreetmap-hrvatska/

Hvala još jednom i nadam se da je bilo zanimljivo!