Ok, done. Thanks for the suggestion!

Yes, I have been there on 2024-12-29, walked from Lokavec by the hiking path to Sv. Urban and back by the road. On that same wiki page that you cite, on grade1, it also clearly states "Usually a paved surface". "usually" is not "always" or "must be". At least a section of the road from Lokavec to the plateau/parking I consider to be better than tracktype3, as is now tagged. But I'll let you be the final judge. Regards Mark.

There is no requirement that a tracktype=grade1 must be paved. The wiki page says: "Solid. Usually a paved surface". It is very rare in Slovenia that a forestry or agricultural track is paved, but it can be wide and reasonably well maintained compacted surface (like in this case). I consider such tracks to be grade1. Regards, Mark.

Oops, fixed. Apparently I changed 'ascent' into 'surface' by mistake in changeset/126389525. Thanks for noticing!

It wasn't me who put that tag on, it was Benđo Jušić about seven years ago (see history). I was just the last
one to touch these objects, keeping the access tag unchanged.

That tag is most likely unwarranted or wrong. The original tagger seems to be inactive for the last six years. Please just remove these tags, the park is public, even though it is next to a school.

Ok, changed "ref" to "name", lowercased "paketomat".

> think that building:levels:underground should only be used on buildings

I agree, removed. I have inherited this tag unintentionally when I merged my locker with a previous version of this locker at a wrong location.

As far as ref vs. a description - I'm not sure. The current text in ref is an exact copy from the GLS website.

Sure, changed. There is no sign, as far as I can remember.

It is odd indeed, but was intentional. The narrow road is steep, accessible by foot and bike but not by wider vehicles, and in that section there are a couple of long, inclined and not tall 'steps'. Didn't come up with better tagging than this. Feel free to change if you think of a more appropriate way of tagging. Perhaps drop the cycling? One would push the bike by handles uphill, but possibly ride down with much care.

Btw, even the power tower by the RTP Bežigrad node/3559320843 is now gone according to Lj aerial map, after the power line was moved underground.

Admittedly my note needs clarification. The text in my 'fixme'
is a direct copy of an info plate on the transition power
tower node/1517026862 .
It claims that the aerial double power line that comes
to this tower transitions and continues underground to two
destinations, length 640m to Žale, the other 600m to Kleče.

I was only able to approximately map one of these two
underground cables, even that one is probably partly
wrong, as its length on the map is 350 m, which is
nowhere near the claimed 600+ m.

The only underground section that is verifiable
is the section from that power tower to the South
along the path by the pitch to the its SE corner.
There are maybe three or four metal maintenance holes
on the ground by that path. Don't know where the cable
continues from that SE corner of the pitch, I just
guessed it would go to the nearby RTP Bežigrad,
but I was probably wrong, likely it goes to Žale RTP.

About the other cable I have no idea where it is routed.

Se ne spomnim več. Bi verjel, da je tam še eno malo znamenje malo proč, če sem ga dodal kot wayside_cross. Bo treba na izlet in preveriti. Na tejle sliki se morda da slutiti še en majhen križ v levem spodnjem kotu slike: https://www.casnik.si/narava-in-pokrajina-foto-jetrbenk/ Nimam pa nič proti, če se ga zbriše.

Se strinjam, sem spremenil. Hvala za opaženje!

Iz https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62772106 se vidi, da sem 2018-09-20 spreminjal je krajši odsek poti z vrha Grla proti zahodu, tisti del, kjer se je pot dalo razbrati iz LIDAR in GURS posnetkov. Glede sumljivega dela poti naprej dol proti Tamarju, tisto je ostalo nespremenjeno od leta 2014, changeset/24180171, uporabnik tommyiommi. Sedajle sem tisti sumljivi plezalni del poti zamenjal z ravno črto, ki se naveže na spodnji del poti, ki je spet viden na LIDAR in GURS DOF025 posnetkih, kar je tudi bližje tistemu na geopediji / hribi.net. Če ima kdo boljšo sled ali podatke, so izboljšave dobrodošle. Če se vrnem na svoj changeset, večino mojih popravkov v njem sloni na moji GPX sledi iz 2018-08-11 od Vršiča do Slemenove špice. Do Grla nisem šel, sled v OSM arhivu tam čez ni moja. Hvala za opozorilo na sumljiv del poti! Pozdrav, Mark.

According to aerial photography (GURS DOF025) the long railway tracks are 1.5 m wide, which would be a normal railway track size; the short tracks are about half that size, about 0.8 m, probably narrow-gauge. These are military artillery ranges - target guides. Haven't seen them in person.

Thanks for fixing! I was aware to be leaving job half-done, hoping for someone to pick it up :) Also the cycleway/footway to the East is now broken. The roundabout is actually a turbo-roundabout (spiraling roads outwards), so this needs further work. Likewise all the roundabouts to the West on Letališka street.

Thank you for noticing inconsistencies fixing errors! I'm fine with your choice regarding mapping sidewalks and cycle tracks style. I rarely touch these, leaving cycleways to cyclist mappers, as you may have noticed :) The reason why I chose to deal with these in this particular stretch of Tržaška street is that the sidewalk and the cycleway take some unexpected turns and detours, often independently, so it seemed to me the cleanest would be just to map each one separately. But I'm fine with your choice, no worries.

Sorry, I missed your previous comment. Thanks for the update. But now there is a missing sidewalk (tag or way) along way/150154689 and way/1007054751 if I understand it correctly.

The line is still visible on the Ljubljana Ortophoto 2020 imagery

Been there, done some mapping the old-fashioned way with a GPS, OSMtracker, and with josm back home. Filled-in lots of details according to the current situation on the ground. Regarding that service road: I talked to someone living there, who happened to be standing there. He explained that the bollard on the back-side has been temporarily removed so this is now their only access to a back-yard by car. The service road terminates on a pedestrian zone with a lift-gate, there is currently no way to enter there by car due to bollards between the pedestrian zone and Prešernova street. They have been promised a rising bollard and access across the pedestrian zone, but it is not yet happening. I have updated the map according to the current situation to the best of my resources - until we get a newer aerial photography of Ljubljana.