I don't understand your hostility. Feedback for mistakes serves no purpose, mistakes by definition are just mistakes!. Conceptual errors are worth pointing out however. I've no idea why you take a dig at me when I admit I and everyone makes mistakes. In the future don't contact me again and feel free to fix any problem you find-in the spirit of OSM. All you have done here is waste both of our time.
Thank you

Hi, yes as trigpoint guessed. Just a mistake. I did quite a bit of work in the area at the time and got it wrong.
Pmailkeey, you probably should have just fixed such an obvious error and moved on-it's what open street map is all about, no?

I had tried but was unaware on how to do it, so added a second box. Sooks like your semicolon works. Thanks

What imagery would it be that it doesn't appear on? Google Street view is all I can think you would use? May I remind you it's seemingly illegal to use google's copyrighted pictures to update OSM.
As for is this new? you'd have to define new because it's not that new to me, has been there for quite a long time. However, it does not seem to be on google street view, which is dated May 2009 putting the date of the box as being fitted in the last 6 years

Hi,
Yes, I meant to delete the street, I have no idea how it would have got there, it was a short line, at a jaunty angle and just doesn't exist.
What I didn't think about was that it was (eroneously) named and was close enough to the real street to make it look right on your "monitoring system". I've moved the name to the correct street.
I've also learned to think a bit more ;-) and that there is a wonderful system behind it all checking street names :-)