It was a mistake. I reverted the changeset. Thanks for the warning.

Ok !!

Thanks for the information. I will calculate the prominences by myself and will re-enter them in OSM.

Hello
I just added Information of peaks with prominences >= 2000m from Wikipedia and I don’t plan to add any more data, so feel free to introduce the data you have.
Best regards.

Canadian Digital Elevation Model shows 3427 and bivouac.com (refered by the Wikipedia article) shows 3433. Other sources (peakbagger, peakvisor) also indicate 3433m.

Hi Davide_sd

I found it here: https://www.ii.uib.no/~petter/mountains/italy.html

I just documented it as source:prominence

This section of the N260 is a narrow (4m), windy, slow road, with same level intersections. It doesn’t connect important cities.
So is not a high performance nor a high important road according to OSM standards: highway=trunk
Classifying it like trunk is even dangerous for drivers who can trust the map because the changes between good a bad sections of this road are sudden and not well indicated.
We are mapping reality, not doing politics.

This section of the N260 is a narrow (4m), windy, slow road, with same level intersections. It doesn’t connect important cities.

So is not a high performance nor a high important road according to OSM standards: highway=trunk

Classifying it like trunk is even dangerous for drivers who can trust the map because the changes between good a bad sections of this road are sudden and not well indicated.

We are mapping reality, not doing politics.