MacLondon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 61053487 | over 5 years ago | Hi Mike. I was around there about 2 weeks this is indeed open, and probably has been open for some time. I've now remove the access=no. Regards,
|
| 85630135 | over 5 years ago | Thanks. I should be able to survey all of these on the 11th. |
| 63293531 | over 5 years ago | Hi. There's nothing to suggest that this has ever been a shared footway and the north end of this way did end where the painted cycle lane ended prior to more recent changes at the miniroundabout. I think it's safe to assume that this was initially just a cycle lane that got wrongly mapped as a separate way. I've done some amendments to just tag the road with cycle lane tagging instead and tried to keep the separate footway to where it's physically separated. However at the south of here at Portal Way it gets a bit confusing on the ground, as there are toucan crossings that don't seem to have obvious cycleways on both sides of the crossings as would be expected. |
| 74238336 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for that. I'm surprised that the raft of changes here could be implemented yet. I know how the final layout will operate here, but I think I might need to survey if that's how this will operate from Monday. |
| 85730502 | over 5 years ago | Hi, this is now corrected. Thanks for pointing it out. |
| 84851565 | over 5 years ago | Now amended, including the night-time access restriction at the entrance from Garrad's Rd. Also added similar restrictions on other sideroads nearby. |
| 84851565 | over 5 years ago | Hi. Are you sure this road is one-way? There has been no entry from the east end of the road segment, which would explain the 'marked as likely oneway by improveosm.org'. However this segment of road has itself been two-way. |
| 78750364 | over 5 years ago | Thanks Jon. I've reverted this to a oneway cycle track again as it's definitely a separated oneway contraflow track. Mac |
| 82016298 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I was wondering if the turn restriction at relation/10813264 should be "no_u_turn" instead of "only_u_turn"? |
| 82469963 | over 5 years ago | Hi, I was wondering if the turn restriction at relation/10876648 should be "no_u_turn" instead of "only_u_turn"? |
| 81287363 | over 5 years ago | Hi Mike, I've remapped the New Cross → Highbury route. [BTW, the note + opening_hours in the route_master (relation/10028999) is no longer accurate.] I didn't however create a ‘New Cross Gate - Highbury & Islington’ route master, as I'd personally consider these routes to just be route variants of the 'Crystal Palace - Highbury & Islington' route. Regards,
|
| 67573628 | over 5 years ago | Yes, all is back to how it should be now. There were a few 'dirty tiles' at a couple of zoom levels that still showed 'ghost' sections of the errant cycleways, so I've used JOSM's 'Force tile rendering' to get these tiles to re-render 'clean'. Mac |
| 67573628 | over 5 years ago | Bernard, I've figured out what has happened here. node/6302908670 got moved (from just south of node/6302908669) to where it's now located (the moved node is also now merged with another cycleway).. The node used to be where the segregated cycleway becomes a shared use cycleway just before it meets Forest Road. I have left it as it is at the moment, just in case you wanted to check out the anomaly again. Mac |
| 82135682 | over 5 years ago | These were added inadvertently to roads when adding the tag to bus stops in a bus route. I've now removed this tagging from the roads. |
| 67573628 | over 5 years ago | It looks as if changeset/82866516 might be behind the issue. |
| 67573628 | over 5 years ago | Hi Bernard. These do indeed look odd and seem to have appeared since the Cycle Map was last updated a few days ago. Unfortunately my desktop isn't working at the moment so I'm limited in what I can do (on my phone) at the moment so I'm unable to properly look into what might have happened here. Mac |
| 82631720 | over 5 years ago | Hi Mike. This part of the sidewalk has been closed off for several months as part of the Tideway project works at Putney Bridge. It would seem as if contraflow cycling isn't allowed here currently, but the sidewalk with the contraflow cycle track presumably will get reopened when works finish, which apparently could be sometime this spring. Not one I'd be likely to know about when it does reopen though, so I put the NCN route along what (at this late stage of the works) is basically a temporarily closed cycle track. Mac |
| 82281955 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for the info, Jez. |
| 82282121 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks. I've now adjusted the relation. |
| 81074823 | almost 6 years ago | Hi, Just to let you know, I've corrected a number of "surface=grassq" that you have tagged. These should be "surface=grass". |