MacLondon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175866405 | about 19 hours ago | Thanks Andy. This gap is now fixed. |
| 168895562 | 6 days ago | No island. I've corrected the error now (and have also remove tactile_paving from the middle of the road.) |
| 174924462 | 15 days ago | Yes, it should all be in the same relation. I've corrected the error now. |
| 174532005 | about 1 month ago | I've removed that duplicate node now. |
| 168057763 | about 2 months ago | Hi Andy,
|
| 172056821 | 2 months ago | Hi, are you sure Hackney Council has already reversed its recent change of direction of the western section of Clifden Rd? |
| 172768579 | 2 months ago | Hi Melaniya,
I did witness bus 115 (relation/3293394) turning that way on Thursday. Most buses and taxis now use way/831157592. Regards,
|
| 170269334 | 3 months ago | Thanks. I've now renamed it to Tanner Lane. |
| 159865936 | 3 months ago | Possibly... but more likely they won't know! |
| 170906373 | 3 months ago | El millor mapa de la xarxa Bicivia planificada és a
La 'ruta' de relation/19325078 (i algunes altres 'rutes' que es van mostrar incorrectament com a Bicivies) no forma part de la xarxa regional AMB. |
| 159865936 | 3 months ago | My guess is that Hackney maybe installed the bollard with the 'shared use' disc, but TfL possibly knew nothing about it. |
| 159865936 | 3 months ago | It's very messy here signage-wise. There's a (shared use) disc on the bollard at node/7483232045 that's facing cyclists coming from Homerton Row... but no sign(s) to indicate where the 'no cycling' kicks in. Ideally they would relocate the zebra crossing (+ convert to a parallel crossing) to be almost in line with Homerton Row. |
| 170269141 | 4 months ago | I've now restored the building to how it had been tagged until recently, and added a node for the POI (without the building tags). |
| 168068511 | 5 months ago | On the ground, it's just not numbered, so it's more "noref=yes". If it wasn't shown and labelled on the official Sustrans map as being part of the NCN, it would actually make more sense. Some of this unnumbered section of NCN is mapped online by EuroVelo as being their route for EV1 and EV2 rather than following the signed NCN 4... but that's probably more to do with EuroVelo not being up to date with how NCN4 seems to have gotten realigned to match a what seems to be a relatively new local route. |
| 168068511 | 6 months ago | It appears to be a Sustrans link to shops at the east end of the route. |
| 167829373 | 6 months ago | Yes, should have been 'foot'. Now corrected. Thanks for pointing out. |
| 165030070 | 8 months ago | I'll have a look again in a few days. Would definitely be better if the signed route from Canning Town did bypass those lights. I did check out the Dock Rd diversion route yesterday. Still a few bits I'm not fully clear about, but there shouldn't be too much to tweak with on OSM when the viaduct works begin takes effect. |
| 147262243 | 8 months ago | I have done. |
| 147262243 | 8 months ago | I've done some further edits on Hammersmith Rd and removed the "disused:" prefix for the ref. I'm not completely sure if the temporary pedestrian ramps have been removed, so I've left them in place. |
| 164936269 | 8 months ago | Source is the NTA's published CycleConnects map for Kilkenny, available at https://consult.nationaltransport.ie/sites/default/files/CycleConnects%20-%20Kilkenny%20Urban%20Cycle%20Network.pdf There's no indication that the cycle network being delivered nationally (including the National Cycle Network) will ever be actual signed routes. |