My guess is that Hackney maybe installed the bollard with the 'shared use' disc, but TfL possibly knew nothing about it.

It's very messy here signage-wise.

There's a (shared use) disc on the bollard at node/7483232045 that's facing cyclists coming from Homerton Row... but no sign(s) to indicate where the 'no cycling' kicks in.

Ideally they would relocate the zebra crossing (+ convert to a parallel crossing) to be almost in line with Homerton Row.

I've now restored the building to how it had been tagged until recently, and added a node for the POI (without the building tags).

On the ground, it's just not numbered, so it's more "noref=yes".

If it wasn't shown and labelled on the official Sustrans map as being part of the NCN, it would actually make more sense.

Some of this unnumbered section of NCN is mapped online by EuroVelo as being their route for EV1 and EV2 rather than following the signed NCN 4... but that's probably more to do with EuroVelo not being up to date with how NCN4 seems to have gotten realigned to match a what seems to be a relatively new local route.

It appears to be a Sustrans link to shops at the east end of the route.

https://explore.osmaps.com/?lat=51.47851&lon=-2.62066&zoom=15.7422&overlays=os-ncn-layer&style=Standard&type=2d

Yes, should have been 'foot'. Now corrected.

Thanks for pointing out.

I'll have a look again in a few days. Would definitely be better if the signed route from Canning Town did bypass those lights.

I did check out the Dock Rd diversion route yesterday. Still a few bits I'm not fully clear about, but there shouldn't be too much to tweak with on OSM when the viaduct works begin takes effect.

I have done.

I've done some further edits on Hammersmith Rd and removed the "disused:" prefix for the ref.

I'm not completely sure if the temporary pedestrian ramps have been removed, so I've left them in place.

Source is the NTA's published CycleConnects map for Kilkenny, available at https://consult.nationaltransport.ie/sites/default/files/CycleConnects%20-%20Kilkenny%20Urban%20Cycle%20Network.pdf

There's no indication that the cycle network being delivered nationally (including the National Cycle Network) will ever be actual signed routes.

It might need updated satellite imagery to get this all accurate, but I get the felling you might have realigned it a bit now.

I have extended the temporary oneway on Dock Rd a little further south after passing there today.

Near the Cycle Shuttle bus stop, I suspect
way/893713893 might be the intended shared use path for the new cycle route. At the moment it's just all very under-signed with the shared paths (and speed limits too) , but hopefully some more signs will come here.

I've an inkling that Dock Rd might open at some point tomorrow.

Should the traffic signals now be removed from node/1683288283?

I spotted it yesterday. Possibly will still get a few more adjustments between here and the roundabout before Monday.

I passed there today. Still closed. Could be at least a few more months before it could open.

Thanks. Was a partially deleted source=" tag.

Now fully deleted.

Regular problem with ID unfortunately.

Would be very tricky to get the right order using ID!

I discovered osm.wiki/Relatify yesterday. It could be particularly useful for mapping new bus route relations although I didn't test it too much.

Hi, as it appears that cyclists entering the circular junction don't have to give way to cyclists who are already on the junction, the junction=roundabout tag isn't correct.

junction=circular could be used instead.

I have readded the is_sidepath* tags, although I've also changed this tagging from the (former) tertiary to secondary.

A lot of geometries will have to be estimates.

I've made a guess based on how it looks that they will use some of the new Dock Rd as part of a temporary access road into the back of the Expressway car park so that they can complete the works/kerbing on the NE side of the current dead end to Dock Rd.