Szia!

Látom, átírtad a Biharia csúcs nevét, viszont az igazi Nagy-Bihar csúcs pár kilométerrel délebbre van :-)

Javítom.

--
Szia: Zsolt

Încă o problemă: ai adăugat punctul de belvedere la traseul turistic banda roşie. Am să le corectez pe amândouă.

Vezi că vârful există deja la câţiva metri distanţă :-) Acesta este un punct de belvedere, şi nu cred că are vreun nume.

--
Zsolt

Hi again!

Forest tracks have no name and no reference, and should not be tagged as "unclassified" (for example, way/383898684). Please stop tagging roads this way, it's incorrect!

Hi again!

Forest tracks have no name and no reference, and should not be tagged as "unclassified" (for example, way/383898683). Please stop tagging roads this way, it's incorrect!

Hi again!

Forest tracks have no name or reference, especially no tags saying where the road goes. Please stop tagging roads this way!

Hi!

These roads don't look like unclassified roads, can you please explain why did you tag them this way?

Looks like you don't care about the rest of the world - I made several comments about your changes, but you seem to ignore them.

Please don't tag forest tracks with a name and/or ref, and don't tag them "tracktype=grade1" because this is incorrect.

PLEASE STOP DESTROYING THE MAP!

Hi!

How is possible for a road to be "surface=dirt" and "tracktype=grade1" the same time? :-)

Hint: the wiki says "tracktype=grade1" is "a paved or heavily compacted hardcore surface".

Please don't tag roads as "tracktype=grade1" unless they really are of that type - especially if they are based on surveys (mine, actually).

Hi!

You changed the tracktype of way/304787204 from "grade4" to "grade1". I tagged this road based on my survey, and I'm pretty sure that "grade4" is correct. Can you please explain why did you change it?

Are you sure that all these tracks are of type "grade1"? For example, ways 102663180, 291203199, 102663186, 102663166 and 102663172 look more like a "grade5" on the satellite map.

If you draw roads based on the satellite map, it's OK - but if you don't know the track type, better don't tag the track type.

Hi!

Are you sure that all these roads are of type "highway=unclassified"? I would be very surprised to see a road of this type through the forest.

You also tagged them with a name ("LuncaSprie-LacuSarat") that shows what places it connects. Please tag roads with a name and/or ref only if it is official (appears on a sign somewhere near the road).

Hi!

Are you sure that these roads are of type "highway=unclassified"? I would be very surprised to see a road of this type through the forest (ways 395485191 and 395560554).

You tagged way/395485191 with a name ("LuncaSprie-LacuSarat") that shows what places it connects. Please tag name and/or ref only if it is official (appears on a sign somewhere near the road).

Hi!

Are you sure that all these tracks are of type "grade1"? For example, ways 201124698 and 395566246 look more like a "grade5" on the satellite map.

If you draw roads based on the satellite map, it's OK - but if you don't know the track type, better don't tag the track type.

> we have local ethnic problems as well

I know, I lived in Romania 32 years.

> for example extremist organizations would like to wipe off Romania out of the world map , divide it and attach it to other country as counties

This is perfectly valid any time in history for any random country in the world and for its neighbor countries :-)

> i am a very tolerant person, and most of the times ignore provocation

I don't see any provocation, we just asked you (very politely!) to explain why did you make some changes.

> i do not replay to message full of hate

I can't discover hate in *my* messages ;-)

Worse yet, way/317120445 has been part of a (very important) hiking route, that now has a gap in it. I really want to know why did you delete this one.

Hi!

You deleted roads that were based on my own survey (and tagged accordingly), have uploaded GPS tracks and are also visible on the satellite imagery (for example, way/389350122).

Paths may not be visible on the satellite imagery (for example, ways 389395745 and 389394072), but they do exist.

Can you please explain why did you delete these ways?

Hi!

You deleted roads that were based on my recent surveys and are also clearly visible on Bing. Can you please explain why?

Hello,

You repeatedly changed the highway type for a lot of ways from "track" to "unclassified" and added a "ref". These ways are definitely forest tracks, I've been there many times (for example, please have a look at my photo: http://ekenagyvarad.ro/pictures/2012-10-21-Biharfured-sunyi-tura/20121021-145405-p1050354.jpg taken from around 46.6673° N, 22.6393° E, facing east).

Please don't change way types and don't add names/refs just to have nicer display on your GPS.

Zsolt Bartos-Elekes ("Müszi")

Hello,

You repeatedly changed the highway type for a lot of ways from "track" to "unclassified" and added a "ref". These ways are definitely forest tracks, I've been there many times (for example, please have a look at my photo: http://ekenagyvarad.ro/pictures/2012-10-21-Biharfured-sunyi-tura/20121021-140152-p1050331.jpg taken from around 46.6626° N, 22.6483° E, facing south-east).

Please don't change way types and don't add names/refs just to have nicer display on your GPS.

Zsolt Bartos-Elekes ("Müszi")

Hello,

You repeatedly changed the highway type for a lot of ways from "track" to "unclassified". These ways are definitely forest tracks, I've been there many times (for example, please have a look at my photo: http://ekenagyvarad.ro/pictures/2012-10-21-Biharfured-sunyi-tura/20121021-110910-p1050239.jpg taken from 46.6716° N, 22.6217° E, facing east).

I already wrote you a short tutorial on how to map forest tracks, sent links to the wiki pages, so please try to respect those rules and don't destroy other people's work.

Zsolt Bartos-Elekes ("Müszi")