Thanks for your mapping! :) Remind that it is important to square the buildings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104146163

Thanks for the mapping. It is important to do not delete the elements that are mapped by other users and that are part of a relation

Thanks for the mapping. It is important to do not delete the elements that are mapped by other users
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101669525

Thanks for your mapping. It is important to keep the area separated in case there are streets between them
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100925805

Thanks for the mapping, but the field should be mapped as cropland not as brown field
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100925718

Hi, thanks for the mapping, but it is important to don't map features that you are not sure about, like the type of leaf. Also the correct tag in the area is natural=wood and not laduse=forest

Thanks for your mapping. It is important to do not delete feature that are not create by you
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100932741

Thanks for your mapping, the waterway was already mapped it is better to continue the already existing geometry than creating overlapping ones
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101446654

Thanks for your mapping. Remind that the forest and the river should not share nodes
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101267088

Hi thanks for your mapping. It is important to keep separate the nodes of features that have different tags, likes highway and wood
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100924748

thanks for your mapping, It is not clear why you delete multiple features in this changeset
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101291293

Hi, thanks for your mapping.
It is important to don't map features with tags that are not the one suggested and not combining them
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101011523

Hi, thanks for your mapping.
It is important to don't map features that are already existing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101011412

Hi gscholz,
I the errors also the one related to the missing roles in the boundary that was not created by the students.
They learn how to deal with basic errors, some issue like roles in relation are not considered also because it is suggested to don't use relation for beginner users.

Hi,
I checked the changeset, and the way you point out has been deleted in this changeset, so the fact that it remains in the tool is just due to a delay in the tool.
Best,
Lorenzo

Hi,
We use OSMCha, and we check the edits in JOSM once by once using its validator.
I check yesterday afternoon, and there were no major errors. The one that you see is from yesterday evening.
I will check and notify the error of the user.
Thanks again :)
Best,
Lorenzo

Hi Guido,
Thanks for anticipating us. We were planning to validate the whole work done by students in the projects about deforestation in the next days. I will explain the issue personally to the student.
For now, I fix it with a translation of the polygon of the forest.
Here the changeset changeset/101102811
I have not new conflicts in JOSM.
Do you think it is fine?
Best,
Lorenzo

Reminds also, that the tag for roads are very depending on the country. And living_streets is a very particular feature
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100575504

Ciao,
non ho idea di cosa abbia preso il copia incolla su josm ahahahah cancello subito grazie per averlo visto

Hi thanks for the mapping but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507269