LimpopoRiver's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171010672 | 4 months ago | Hi PengualaHeadphones,
|
| 166131187 | 8 months ago | Done, have a nice day! |
| 166131187 | 8 months ago | Hello FajrAl, thanks for reaching out! My intention with this edit was to prevent the building from intersecting road, I now see the tags that indicate this road passes under the building. I’ve typically seen covered roads modeled by splitting the road at the entry and exit points of the building, and tagging just the covered section of road with covered=yes (covered=*). Would you be open to me updating the modeling to reflect this approach?
|
| 147498172 | almost 2 years ago | Hi HosseyNJF, thanks for reaching out and providing your local knowledge! After doing further investigation, it appears aerial imagery does support the existence of concrete roadblocks. Might I recommend applying a barrier=jersey_barrier tag (barrier=jersey_barrier) to the appropriate nodes on the connecting tertiary roads rather than changing the classification to ‘highway=footway’? This way vehicles can still drive into those roads, but not through the blocking barriers. I look forward to hearing back from you! |