Legras_TT's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 186719000 | Hi, thanks for your contributions. I've noticed there seems to be a very large number of nodes on the roads you have added around here - it looks to be excessive compared to the imagery source you've used, and the ways also appear to be split needlessly. It's usually best practice to use the minimum number of nodes and ways to accurately represent the geometry of a feature, and only split ways where separate attributes are required.
|
|
| 185939231 | Thanks a lot for fixing up those buildings. I'll advise the competition organisers to award you a "Green Card". I think the other mapper has also improved their contributions based on your advice. Cheers - Peter |
|
| 186054126 | Hi there, thanks for your contributions. Just a quick tip - the corners of buildings can be made perfectly 90 degrees by using the "Q" shortcut. 👍
|
|
| 185286997 | Reverted in changeset/185378238 |
|
| 185171423 | Thanks for updating this! I'll mark my note as closed. Cheers |
|
| 182361400 | Further to the above I have re-added traffic signals and turn restrictions in changeset/182585204. |
|
| 182361400 | Hi, the geometry is fixed in changeset/182584807 and I'll review the turn restrictions etc now. There may be some broken bus routes also but they should be fairly straightforward to fix. |
|
| 182361400 | Hi, thanks for bringing this to my attention. My bad regarding the McCaffrey Dr/Lookout Rd intersection, I have GPS traces from the previous week that I can use to fix this - will do that now. |
|
| 140347883 | Thanks for taking another look. It certainly is an interesting case! The entry conditional on whether it is a "cruise ship day" seem like it would be difficult to encode in the OSM tagging structure, but I guess it boils down to "whether you have a good reason to access the cruise terminal on a particular day" - so I'm thinking perhaps the route through the port along Sommerville Road should be `access=permissive`? And the Robert Street entrance I suppose should restrict motor vehicles to `private`. |
|
| 140347883 | Hello, thanks for your contributions.
|