LateNightTone's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 117436113 | I'd say so if the imagery looks normal – I didn't add them originally, and probably missed them in my edits, but I know the houses on these streets have been rebuilt in the past 10 years. Work away 😊 |
|
| 59595607 | A lovely holiday spot, I'm sure 😁 |
|
| 182038134 | Oops, I meant note/4918056 |
|
| 113479788 | According to Sabre description, yes, so have updated. |
|
| 159131613 | I didn't set it as secondary myself... but I've gone with the description on Sabre that all of this stretch (former A5) is continuation of the B84. |
|
| 149095940 | Oops! And I followed up with roof:height... I think roof:height is what I was originally going for. I've removed the dodgy ones, thanks! |
|
| 179809355 | Thanks for that! Must have made the mistake once and then copied them over. Now fixed :-) |
|
| 177645221 | Thanks for the A30 edits. Can I ask why in Lisburn centre you've extended the A30 east along Bachelor's Walk? way/8212883 There's no signage suggesting it's an A-road, and publicly available info on Sabre ( https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/A30_(Northern_Ireland) ) suggests that at least historically it only started at Antrim Street/Bow Street junction and headed north. |
|
| 172179362 | Thanks for flagging – it was meant to be roof:orientation=across. And I can confirm it's part of the cafe building to the right, not the house to the left. |
|
| 144631412 | Hi, yes it's correct – you can see on GRAFCAN imagery that it is on top of the tunnel section of Avenida Nelson Mandela, and ends directly above where the latter enters the tunnel. If it's an issue with the proximity of the service road end-node and the node where the tunnel/non-tunnel sections join, it would be normal to add noexit=yes to the service road end node. But in case it makes the situation clearer, I've just extended the service road by one more node, to the gate beside the adjacent building, since it does provide access to this. |
|
| 152649178 | If you're looking at this on demo.fmap.com, there are various rendering issues with how multiple building:parts interact, it's quite unpredictable - in the end I gave up as the figures in the tags should be about right, but the renderer makes a mess of the rendered shapes. I'm not sold on what's there, so feel free to work away 😊 |
|
| 177734584 | No prob, we've all done it 😊 do please keep an eye on the other sets of imagery if you see a discrepancy though. I think I've restored it to how it was. Worth displaying the Notes data too, as a pointer for any known issues. |
|
| 177734584 | (*demolished) |
|
| 177734584 | Ah... I think you unwittingly undid some careful work I'd done at way/1471435057, mapping the new construction of houses related to note note/4989517 The house you restored has been deomlished. |
|
| 178636590 | Thanks for your edit cvwilson. However I've reverted this deletion – I think you may have misunderstood the purpose of mapping "under construction" elements. The deleted ways were tagged with construction elements, e.g. highway=construction, construction=secondary, which mean they are mapped features that are actually under construction on the ground right now. So this is in keeping with the OpenStreetMap principle of "map what's on the ground" (osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground). It also assists when aerial imagery is updated and it's unclear from above whether the road is open yet or not: construction tags make it clear that it is only a construction and traffic cannot be routed along it. I hope this helps to clarify why I've returned the ways to their original state. Do respond here or send me a message if you'd like to discuss further (or to discuss anything else), I'm happy to help 😊 |
|
| 147293022 | Goot spot, thanks! I think this was from before I discovered OSM notes were a thing. Now deleted. |
|
| 131152146 | You have very good eyes :-) Well done. Feel free to remove the fixme tag if you've done everything you need to. I've probably placed a bunch of these around the place, before I realised OSM notes existed :D |
|
| 120137916 | Ah, fair enough – I thought you might have been working from an external NI Water source, a list or something. I'm inclined to remove the pumping station area, as there's no NI Water signage (invariably the case at their sites), and any signage that is visible is in the same branding as the estate/farm signs. So it seems the entire area is part of a farming enterprise at least. Is that ok with you? |
|
| 120137916 | Sorry, this is a bit of an old edit to call up. Are you sure this is an NI Water pumping station? As there's no signage around it, and it looks like the whole area is just a large farmyard, so I think these are storage tanks for slurry and/or an anaerobic digester. |
|
| 135274004 | Spot on, good work :-) |