I did have one other thought, perhaps man_made=breakwater would be a more appropriate tag for the entire area?

Hi honapak, thanks for the comment. You're right about the two separate areas with identical names, I did think about making them a named multi-polygon relation (with the two ways as members), but didn't follow it through at the time; I'll update now.

Regarding the actual split, it does reflect what's on the ground; mapped pedestrian areas can be navigated in multiple directions across them, but on Tyburn Quay there are very real barriers between these two spaces, with navigation only possible via the steps or ramp as mapped. In fact I was quite surprised to find the odd long drop that was not protected by a railing (hence the "retaining wall" I added on one section) which I can see being pretty dangerous if ever anyone has some drink in them...

Re leisure=park, I'm not sure that's appropriate here?

1. As per the wiki (and general experience), parks are usually at least semi-natural spaces, while there are no natural aspects to Tyburn Quay, only paved walkways.
2. Parks are usually publicly owned spaces, with implicit or explicit rights of way, while this is a wholly private development owned by the water company, and they could rescind access at any time.
3. While there are benches and places for people to gather, the same can be said for the entire embankment, and this would not be considered a park.

I should add that the boundary and buildings were well mapped, so well done getting these into OSM.

Thanks for your survey of house numbers, really useful stuff.

When you encounter a mapped "house" which should actually be more than one house... rather than adding multiple numbers e.g. 2-4, could you either split the house into two please, or add a note for someone to come back to do it? Otherwise, once it's been tagged with a proper address it's unlikely to be spotted and fixed later. I just found way/776078163 by chance (now split), and can see you have a few others in this changeset.

I meant to tag part of the roundabout: way/376095718

Hi, I think some baby may have gone with the bathwater at the entrance to Airport Road ;-) The roundabout is now no longer tagged as such.

Also look out for the odd road segment still with unclassified/tertiary status, there are a few about (I fixed one or two).

I must say, it was news to me that the whole of Sydenham Road is unadopted road! But it makes sense I suppose, given the Harbour Police patrol the whole area.

Hi MCDA, similar to the query on changeset/28555576... there seem to be two identical place names a short distance from each other, these are called Mass Hill: node/3407595837 and node/3407595838.

Hi MCDA, this ais a very old changeset I'm dredging up, but I notice at the time you created two places with the same details on this changeset. They're only a short distance from each other. Any idea which is the correct location?
node/3326198457 and node/3326198458.

Well spotted! Looking at the history, the old note always been in that rough vicinity. Looks like it was never moved whenever the Post Office closed beside what's now M&S (previously Co-op as I remember, but I don't remember the Post Office there). I'll shift the old node over to the current location in order to keep its history, consolidate any info from my one, and then delete the newer node.

Yes, you'd be right - feel free to remove :-)

Thanks for that - npw updated based on the later imagery.

Thanks for the poke - I'd already mapped these, must have forgottent o remove the fixme (another one of my pre-discovery of notes tags)

I honestly don't know :-D must have been a typo/autocomplete. Now corrected, thanks.

Ha - yes, I agonised a bit about how to map that; this seemed like the safest way!

Doh indeed! :-) Ok, thanks, it could be useful to find out.

That's helpful, thanks! I did chuckle at your mention of places that time forgot :-)

Yes, the distance quoted in that doc against "Dam Walk" suggests inclusion of the entire distance from Main Street (currently labelled Derinilla Lane) to Moneylane Road. Having looked at some non-free streetlevel imagery in the area for backup (the current free items offer no help), I note that, pre-July 2023, the entrance to Derinilla Lane was simultaneously labelled "The Dam Lane, and also "Derinilla Lane leading to The Dam Lane". These signs are subsequently painted over in July 2023, but I don't know what's present now. Perhaps if these have changed from their original text, they might offer some clarity? (Or none at all of course!) I don't suppose you're somewhere nearby?

If signage has continued to display Derinilla Lane and The Dam Lane, I'm inclined to give those names credence and provide the unsigned "Dam Walk" as the alt_name... which might then dictate a similar approach for Walsh's Lane, for consistency if nothing else?

Hi @ramthelinefeed, just checking back to an old changeset here in relation to a note nearby. I see you tagged way/231512205/history/4 with the name Dam Lane, and note/3162393 suggests the name Walsh's Lane. Would you have any input or preference here? I wasn't sure what the source might have been for Dam Lane.

Ah, that's fair (if unfortunate!) - I'm sure it's a lovely spot. I was only really checking as there's a note/576500 nearby that had been opened 10 years ago, to say the path was closed, but there'd been a few edits since then (yours being the last) so I wasn't certain what the story was. Thanks for confirming.

Apologies for the message, this is an old edit of yours – but I see someone raised a note/576500 where they thought it was accessible. Can I ask where you discovered the closure?

Hi ramthelinefeed, I see a couple of years ago you created relation/17712258 and relation/17712369. Since then, note/4910984 has been created by a anonymous user suggesting that the track between Green Road and Ardmore Road doesn't connect. A cursory check on streetview doesn't show a track in that position, biut imagery is from 2011.

Would you mind confirming? It might be that the track needs to be truncated, and the walking and cycle routes removed from that stretch.

Thanks for the extra local information. I've consolidated the extra data you had added to node/13329406661 into the existing school area (way/246882109), which already contained some of the addresses and contact details. Also removed address details from the shool building polygon in version way/804965004/history/5

Best to avoid mapping duplicate entries, only one object should contain the school details, otherwise it creates confusion in GPS and for end users of the map data.