LakeComo's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 118467052 | almost 4 years ago | Eu usei o Maxar Premium Imagery. Parecia um cruzamento típico para mim, e as imagens não mostravam um meio-fio, então pensei que o link_primário estava conectado errado e deveria estar conectado ao residencial. Percebo que devo procurar imagens do solo antes de fazer tais suposições. Muito obrigado por apontar isso e estarei ciente desse fato no futuro. Atenciosamente, LakeComo I did use Maxar Premium Imagery. It looked like a typical intersection to me, and the imagery did not show a curb, so I thought that the primary_link was misconnected and should have been connected to the residential. I realize that I should look for ground imagery first before making such assumptions. Thank you very much for pointing that out and I will be cognizant of that fact in the future. Best regards, LakeComo |
| 118467052 | almost 4 years ago | Olá, Adrianojbr. Obrigado pela sua mensagem. Vejo agora que o Mapillary mostra um meio-fio que impede a manobra da Rua Paulo Alves de Liz para a Rua São Jorge (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=203923405234989). Obrigado por atualizar a conexão e tenha um bom dia! Hello, adrianojbr. Thank you for your message. I see now that Mapillary shows a curb which prevents the maneuver from Rua Paulo Alves de Liz to Rua São Jorge (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=203923405234989). Thanks for updating the connection and have a good day! |
| 83134237 | about 4 years ago | Bernardo,
The only inconsistency I could spot was very small residential roads such as way/723036770 that is disconnected from the greater residential network from node/6781996418 to node/2867841747. Not sure if you would prefer bridging the gap there with a residential section, or leaving it as it is.
|
| 83134237 | over 4 years ago | Bernardo60, hello. I changed this road back in 2020 since the OSM wiki (highway=track) states that surface is not a specification for track roads, rather that if there were "permanent human settlements/facilities" like that seen near node/2867841734 and that it was either residential or unclassified the majority of time since its creation. I will leave that classification as you recently changed it, but wanted to confirm that the southern most portion from www.openstreetmap.org/node/2867841687 to node/2867841747 would not be a functional road that drivers could use and could possibly be split and set to unclassified/residential. Thanks for your confirmation. |
| 81477139 | almost 6 years ago | Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, thanks for reaching out. I’ve removed the feature. |
| 81477139 | almost 6 years ago | Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, thanks for reaching out. I’ve removed the feature. |