OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
118467052 almost 4 years ago

Eu usei o Maxar Premium Imagery. Parecia um cruzamento típico para mim, e as imagens não mostravam um meio-fio, então pensei que o link_primário estava conectado errado e deveria estar conectado ao residencial. Percebo que devo procurar imagens do solo antes de fazer tais suposições. Muito obrigado por apontar isso e estarei ciente desse fato no futuro. Atenciosamente, LakeComo

I did use Maxar Premium Imagery. It looked like a typical intersection to me, and the imagery did not show a curb, so I thought that the primary_link was misconnected and should have been connected to the residential. I realize that I should look for ground imagery first before making such assumptions. Thank you very much for pointing that out and I will be cognizant of that fact in the future. Best regards, LakeComo

118467052 almost 4 years ago

Olá, Adrianojbr. Obrigado pela sua mensagem. Vejo agora que o Mapillary mostra um meio-fio que impede a manobra da Rua Paulo Alves de Liz para a Rua São Jorge (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=203923405234989). Obrigado por atualizar a conexão e tenha um bom dia!

Hello, adrianojbr. Thank you for your message. I see now that Mapillary shows a curb which prevents the maneuver from Rua Paulo Alves de Liz to Rua São Jorge (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=203923405234989). Thanks for updating the connection and have a good day!

83134237 about 4 years ago

Bernardo,
Thank you for your explanation. I just wanted to confirm since the road seemed possible to be driven by compact cars in ground level imagery like https://kartaview.org/details/2407810/49/track-info. However, as you say, it would be difficult if it was not set as a oneway as two cars in opposite directions would have to yield to one another. I will keep your guidance in mind if I ever come back to roads such as these in the future.

The only inconsistency I could spot was very small residential roads such as way/723036770 that is disconnected from the greater residential network from node/6781996418 to node/2867841747. Not sure if you would prefer bridging the gap there with a residential section, or leaving it as it is.
Thank you.

83134237 over 4 years ago

Bernardo60, hello. I changed this road back in 2020 since the OSM wiki (highway=track) states that surface is not a specification for track roads, rather that if there were "permanent human settlements/facilities" like that seen near node/2867841734 and that it was either residential or unclassified the majority of time since its creation.

I will leave that classification as you recently changed it, but wanted to confirm that the southern most portion from www.openstreetmap.org/node/2867841687 to node/2867841747 would not be a functional road that drivers could use and could possibly be split and set to unclassified/residential. Thanks for your confirmation.

81477139 almost 6 years ago

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, thanks for reaching out. I’ve removed the feature.

81477139 almost 6 years ago

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, thanks for reaching out. I’ve removed the feature.